JCB logo
R&D Systems
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 749K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanderkooi, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Erecinska, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vanderkooi, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Erecinska, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 100, 435-441, Copyright © 1985 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Mobility of fluorescent derivatives of cytochrome c in mitochondria

JM Vanderkooi, G Maniara and M Erecinska

Motion of cytochrome c bound to giant (2-10-micron diam) mitochondria isolated from the waterbug Lethocerus indicus was examined using the technique of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Fluorescent cytochrome c was exchanged for native cytochrome c through partly damaged outer membrane. Recovery profiles were not statistically different when the fluorescence from iron-free cytochrome c or fluorescein-labeled cytochrome c was used and were essentially the same in the presence or absence of an uncoupler. In the presence of excess porphyrin cytochrome c, the apparent diffusion coefficient was 6 X 10(- 11) cm2/s in 0.3 M sucrose-mannitol-EDTA and 3 X 10(-10) cm2/s in 0.10 M KCl/0.10 M sucrose. At concentrations of porphyrin cytochrome c that are stoichiometric with cytochrome c oxidase and for mitochondria in which excess cytochrome c was washed away, two components were observed in the recovery profile. The diffusion coefficient of the fast component was 1 X 10(-10) cm2/s. The second component showed no recovery during the time scale of measurement (D less than 10(-12) cm2/s). We speculate on the origin of the immobile fraction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents