JCB logo
Get More Out of Microscopy - Agilent iMIC 2000
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 13 November 2000. doi:10.1083/jcb.151.4.739
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nicklas, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nicklas, R. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2000/11/739/ $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 151, Number 4, November 13, 2000 739-748


Original Article

Dynein Is a Transient Kinetochore Component Whose Binding Is Regulated by Microtubule Attachment, Not Tension

Jennifer M. Kinga, Tom S. Haysb, and R. Bruce Nicklasa
a Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
b Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108

Correspondence to: R. Bruce Nicklas, LSRC Bldg., Box 91000, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708. Tel:(919) 613-8196 Fax:(919) 613-8177

Cytoplasmic dynein is the only known kinetochore protein capable of driving chromosome movement toward spindle poles. In grasshopper spermatocytes, dynein immunofluorescence staining is bright at prometaphase kinetochores and dimmer at metaphase kinetochores. We have determined that these differences in staining intensity reflect differences in amounts of dynein associated with the kinetochore. Metaphase kinetochores regain bright dynein staining if they are detached from spindle microtubules by micromanipulation and kept detached for 10 min. We show that this increase in dynein staining is not caused by the retraction or unmasking of dynein upon detachment. Thus, dynein genuinely is a transient component of spermatocyte kinetochores.

We further show that microtubule attachment, not tension, regulates dynein localization at kinetochores. Dynein binding is extremely sensitive to the presence of microtubules: fewer than half the normal number of kinetochore microtubules leads to the loss of most kinetochoric dynein. As a result, the bulk of the dynein leaves the kinetochore very early in mitosis, soon after the kinetochores begin to attach to microtubules. The possible functions of this dynein fraction are therefore limited to the initial attachment and movement of chromosomes and/or to a role in the mitotic checkpoint.

Key Words: cytoplasmic dynein, kinetochores, kinetochore microtubules, micromanipulation, tension


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents