JCB logo
R&D Systems
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online March 12, 2007
doi:10.1083/jcb.200608109
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 176, No. 6, 807-818
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $30.00
© 2007 Pajalunga et al.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Supplemental Material Index
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pajalunga, D.
Right arrow Articles by Crescenzi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pajalunga, D.
Right arrow Articles by Crescenzi, M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Article

Critical requirement for cell cycle inhibitors in sustaining nonproliferative states

Deborah Pajalunga, Alessia Mazzola, Anna Maria Salzano, Maria Grazia Biferi, Gabriele De Luca, and Marco Crescenzi

Department of Environment and Primary Prevention, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Roma, Italy

Correspondence to Marco Crescenzi: marco.crescenzi{at}iss.it

In adult vertebrates, most cells are not in the cell cycle at any one time. Physiological nonproliferation states encompass reversible quiescence and permanent postmitotic conditions such as terminal differentiation and replicative senescence. Although these states appear to be attained and maintained quite differently, they might share a core proliferation-restricting mechanism. Unexpectedly, we found that all sorts of nonproliferating cells can be mitotically reactivated by the sole suppression of histotype-specific cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitors (CKIs) in the absence of exogenous mitogens. RNA interference–mediated suppression of appropriate CKIs efficiently triggered DNA synthesis and mitosis in established and primary terminally differentiated skeletal muscle cells (myotubes), quiescent human fibroblasts, and senescent human embryo kidney cells. In serum-starved fibroblasts and myotubes alike, cell cycle reactivation was critically mediated by the derepression of cyclin D–cdk4/6 complexes. Thus, both temporary and permanent growth arrest must be actively maintained by the constant expression of CKIs, whereas the cell cycle–driving cyclins are always present or can be readily elicited. In principle, our findings could find wide application in biotechnology and tissue repair whenever cell proliferation is limiting.

Abbreviations used in this paper: cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; CKI, cdk inhibitor; HEK, human embryo kidney; MEF, mouse embryo fibroblast; MSC, mouse satellite cell; MyHC, myosin heavy chain; pRb, retinoblastoma protein; TD, terminally differentiated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

A simple reentry into the cell cycle
Mitch Leslie
J. Cell Biol. 2007 176: 730. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents