JCB logo
Quantitative Colocalization Analysis Software
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 788K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 25, 129-139, Copyright © 1965 by Rockefeller University Press

ARTICLE

ANALYSIS OF MUSCLE CONTRACTION BY ULTRAVIOLET MICROBEAM DISRUPTION OF SARCOMERE STRUCTURE

R. E. Stephens 1

1 From the Department of Cytology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, and the Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

In an effort to differentiate between the sliding filament theory for muscle contraction and alternative views which propose attachment between actin and myosin filaments at or across the H zone, rabbit psoas myofibrils were irradiated in various areas of the sarcomere with an ultraviolet microbeam. Irradiation of the I band appears to destroy the actin filaments; in vitro irradiation of F actin causes an irreversible depolymerization of the protein. Irradiation of the A band disorients the myosin but causes no apparent loss of dry mass. These effects are maximal at the wavelength of maximum absorption of the proteins involved. Actin filaments, released at the Z line of a sarcomere, are seen to slide into the A band on addition of ATP. Irradiation of a full A band prevents contraction, whereas irradiation of two-thirds of the A band, leaving a lateral edge intact, permits contraction at the non-irradiated edge. Thus contraction can occur in what is in essence only one-third of a sarcomere, eliminating any necessity for postulated H zone connections. These observations are in complete accord with the classical sliding filament theory but incompatible with either the contralateral filament hypothesis or the actin folding model for muscle contraction.

Submitted on June 22, 1964


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents