JCB logo
Accuri Cytometers
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 907K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hungerford, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by DiBerardino, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hungerford, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by DiBerardino, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J. Biophys. and Biochem. Cytol., Vol 4, 391-400, Copyright © 1958 by Rockefeller University Press

ARTICLE

Cytological Effects of Prefixation Treatment

David A. Hungerford 1 and Marie DiBerardino 1

1 From the Institute for Cancer Research, Philadelphia

The effects produced by prefixation treatments on cells in metaphase from 10-day mouse fetuses and from several embryonic stages of the frog were investigated. The technical value of some of these pretreatments is noted.

Pretreatment with isotonic solutions (both ionic and non-ionic in the case of the mouse, ionic only in the frog) generally produced a similar effect, viz., chromosomal swelling with little effect on the spindle. A notable exception is provided by frog embryos preceding the neurula stage; spindle disorganization without chromosomal swelling was produced by pretreatment in isotonic modified Niu-Twitty solution, containing no divalent cations.

Pretreatment with hypotonic solutions (both ionic and non-ionic in the case of the mouse, ionic only in the frog) generally produced several major effects, viz., despiralization of chromosomes, chromatid separation, and spindle disorganization. The conclusion is drawn from the mouse data that, in order to produce these effects, pretreating solutions must be of low osmotic pressure. Low ionic strength alone (e.g., isotonic sucrose solutions) is not sufficient.

As differentiation of frog embryos progressed, pretreatments either of longer duration or with solutions of increasing degrees of hypotonicity were required to produce comparable intensities of the same effects.

Many of the effects on metaphases produced by hypotonic pretreatment of frog embryos were reversible by subsequent exposure to isotonic solutions.

The significance of results presented here is discussed briefly with respect to some current considerations of the macromolecular structure of chromosomes.

Submitted on January 28, 1958


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents