JCB logo
PeproTech: Your source for Cell Biology Research Reagents
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 769K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hess, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lagg, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hess, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lagg, S. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J. Biophys. and Biochem. Cytol., Vol 4, 717-725, Copyright © 1958 by Rockefeller University Press

ARTICLE

Calf Thymus Composition. A Comparison of Differential Centrifugation and Chemical Fractionation Procedures

Eugene L. Hess Ph.D.1 and Saima E. Lagg 1

1 (From The Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology, Shrewsbury, Massachusetts)

The extraction behavior of thymus and the composition of fractions prepared from this organ has been studied. Sequential extraction methods using 0.15 M NaCl followed by water gave information with respect to the weight fraction of cytoplasmic and nuclear constituents. Lipide, nucleic acid, and electrophoretic analysis of the extracts provided additional information. A less complex electrophoretic pattern was obtained from subsequent extracts in the sequence.

Sucrose and saline dispersates obtained from tissue fragmented with either the Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer or in a Waring blendor were fractionated, using standard differential sedimentation methods. The fractions obtained by means of four different dispersion procedures were compared in terms of yield, chemical analysis, and electrophoretic composition.

The quantity of material in thymus having the sedimentation characteristics of liver mitochondrial and microsomal fractions was remarkably small. Both the suspension medium employed and the method used to bring about a disruption of the cells in the tissue affected the yield of "particulate" material. The components present in the later extracts in the sequence, E4 to E7, in the case of sequential extraction study resembled with respect to chemical composition and electrophoretic characteristics, the microsome fraction prepared by differential sedimentation methods.

About 76 per cent of the PNA in the tissue appeared to be in the cytoplasm. The remaining 24 per cent PNA was found in the nucleus and accounted for 1.7 per cent of nucleus on a dry weight basis.

From 75 to 88 per cent of cytoplasmic PNA was extracted from the tissue and 76 to 94 per cent of the PNA in the extract was found in the final supernatant solutions, depending upon the dispersion methods and suspension medium used in the extraction procedure.

The composition of the final supernatant fractions using differential sedimentation methods were comparable in terms of electrophoretic properties, protein concentration, nucleic acid content, and fractionation behavior to saline extracts E1 to E3, of thymus used in earlier studies.

Submitted on April 16, 1958


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents