JCB logo
R&D Systems
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 745K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Flaherty, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Flaherty, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 80, 564-572, Copyright © 1979 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Selective neutrophil desensitization to chemotactic factors

JT O'Flaherty, DL Kreutzer, HJ Showell, G Vitkauskas, EL Becker and PA Ward

In the presence of extracellular calcium and magnesium, a series of chemotactic oligopeptides and C5a caused aggregation of human polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs). This cellular response developed rapidly and began to reverse 2 min after exposure to the chemotactin. In the absence of the bivalent cations, none of the chemotactins stimulated the aggregation response. If cells were first exposed to a chemotactin and then treated with calcium and magnesium, aggregation was detected only after addition of the cations, and the magnitude of the response fell sharply as the interval between the addition of chemotactin and addition of cations was lengthened: when this interval exceeded 2 min, aggregation was barely detectable. This loss of reactivity persisted even when cells were re-exposed to fresh chemotactic factor and washed between the first and second exposures. In all instances, however, loss of cellular reactivity was highly selective: cells preincubated with any chemotactic oligopeptide were hyporesponsive to subsequent stimulation with an oligopeptide but remained fully responsive to C5a; cells preincubated with C5A were hyporesponsive to C5a but retained their responsitivity to the oligopeptides. Because this selectivity parallels the known specificities of these chemotactic factors for their receptors in or on the neutrophil, desensitization may reflect functional loss of receptors after stimulation. Alternatively, this selectivity may indicate that morphologically identical neutrophils contain subpopulations of cells with varying reactivities to receptor-bound chemotactic factors. In either event, desensitization may be useful in functionally defining chemotactic factors and their respective receptors. The rapidity of development of desensitization suggests that it may operate to limit or moderate various in vitro and in vivo neutrophil responses to chemotactic factors.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents