JCB logo
PeproTech: Your source for Cell Biology Research Reagents
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 2565K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eichhorn, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Peterkofsky, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eichhorn, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Peterkofsky, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 81, 26-42, Copyright © 1979 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Local anesthetic-induced inhibition of collagen secretion in cultured cells under conditions where microtubules are not depolymerized by these agents

JH Eichhorn and B Peterkofsky

Tertiary amine local anesthetics previously have been shown to influence some microtubule-dependent cellular functions. Since several cell secretion processes, including secretion of collagen, have been shown to be inhibited by microtubule-disrupting drugs such as colchicine, we determined whether local anesthetics affect collagen secretion. Six local anesthetics inhibited collagen and non-collagen protein secretion (up to 98%) into the extracellular medium of 3T3 cells and human fibroblasts, an effect apparently independent of influences on proline transport and total protein synthesis. A combination of colchicine and cytochalasin B did not duplicate the effects of local anesthetics. The effects of subsaturating concentrations of colchicine and procaine on secretion were additive, suggesting that both drugs act on the secretory pathway at the level of microtubules, but other effects of the two types of drugs were strikingly different. In comparing the mechanisms of action of colchicine and local anesthetics, it was seen that, in contrast to colchicine, radioactive procaine and lidocaine were slowly transported into 3T3 cells, did not bind to the tubulin-containing TCA-insoluble fraction, and did not bind to purified tubulin in vitro. The fraction of cellular tubulin present as microtubules (47% in normal cells) was determined by measuring tubulin in stabilized, sedimentable microtubules compared to total tubulin, using a [3H]colchicine binding assay. Pretreatment of cells in the cold or with colchicine led to depolymerization of microtubules, but pretreatment with five local anesthetics tested did not. Therefore, in contrast to colchicine, local anesthetics in concentrations that inhibit secretion do not directly interact with or depolymerize microtubules. These drugs, however, do affect a microtubule-dependent process and may do so by detaching the microtubular system from the cell membrane.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents