JCB logo
Keystone Symposia 2009 Meetings
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 8386K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirokawa, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mooseker, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirokawa, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mooseker, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 96, 1325-1336, Copyright © 1983 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Mechanism of brush border contractility studied by the quick-freeze, deep-etch method

N Hirokawa, TC Keller 3d, R Chasan and MS Mooseker

We have analyzed terminal web contraction in sheets of glycerinated chicken small intestine epithelium and in isolated intestinal brush borders using a quick-freeze, deep-etch, rotary shadow replication technique. In the presence of Mg-ATP at 37 degrees C, the terminal web region of each cell in the glycerinated sheet and of each isolated brush border became severely constricted at the level of its zonula adherens (ZA). Consequently, the individual brush borders rounded up, splaying out their microvilli in fanlike patterns. The most prominent ultrastructural changes that occurred during terminal web contraction were a dramatic decrease in the diameter of the circumferential ring composed of a bundle of 8-9-nm filaments adjacent to the zonula adherens and a decrease in the number of cross-linkers between the microvillus rootlets. Microvilli were not retracted into the terminal web. We have used myosin S1 decoration to demonstrate that most of the circumferential bundle filaments are actin and that the actin filaments are arranged in the bundle with mixed polarity. Some filaments within the bundle did not decorate with myosin S1 and had tiny projections that appeared to be attached to adjacent actin filaments. Because of their morphology and immunofluorescent localization of myosin within this region of the terminal web, we propose that these undecorated filaments are myosin. From these results, we conclude that brush border contraction is caused primarily by an active sliding of actin and myosin filaments within the circumferential bundle of filaments associated with the ZA.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents