|
||

* Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Propre de Recherche 9026, 33077 Bordeaux, Cedex, France; and
Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JR
United Kingdom
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The spindle checkpoint ensures proper chromosome segregation by delaying anaphase until all
chromosomes are correctly attached to the mitotic spindle. We investigated the role of the fission yeast bub1
gene in spindle checkpoint function and in unperturbed mitoses. We find that bub1+ is essential for the fission
yeast spindle checkpoint response to spindle damage
and to defects in centromere function. Activation of the
checkpoint results in the recruitment of Bub1 to centromeres and a delay in the completion of mitosis. We
show that Bub1 also has a crucial role in normal, unperturbed mitoses. Loss of bub1 function causes chromosomes to lag on the anaphase spindle and an increased
frequency of chromosome loss. Such genomic instability is even more dramatic in
bub1 diploids, leading to
massive chromosome missegregation events and loss of
the diploid state, demonstrating that bub1+ function is
essential to maintain correct ploidy through mitosis. As
in larger eukaryotes, Bub1 is recruited to kinetochores
during the early stages of mitosis. However, unlike its
vertebrate counterpart, a pool of Bub1 remains centromere-associated at metaphase and even until telophase. We discuss the possibility of a role for the Bub1
kinase after the metaphase-anaphase transition.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ACCURATE chromosome segregation through mitosis
requires the proper attachment of kinetochores to
the spindle before anaphase begins. Kinetochore
capture by microtubules is an event which is primarily governed by chance and is therefore prone to error (for review see Nicklas, 1997
). The spindle checkpoint ensures high fidelity chromosome segregation by delaying anaphase until all chromosomes are correctly attached to the
spindle (for review see Elledge, 1996
; Rudner and Murray,
1996
; Wells, 1996
; Allshire, 1997
; Hardwick, 1998
).
Genetic analyses in budding yeast have identified some
of the genes involved in the spindle checkpoint pathway.
Mutations in the three MAD (mitotic arrest-deficient)
genes, MAD1-3, and the three BUB (budding uninhibited
by benzimidazole) genes, BUB1-3 result in hypersensitivity to spindle poisons as mutant cells are unable to arrest
mitotic progression in response to spindle damage (Hoyt
et al., 1991
; Li and Murray, 1991
). Among these checkpoint components are protein kinases and phosphoproteins suggesting that checkpoint function requires a phosphorylation-based transduction pathway. Bub1 is a protein
kinase that can bind and phosphorylate Bub3 (Roberts
et al., 1994
). Mad1 can bind Mad2 (Chen, R.-H., and K.G.
Hardwick, unpublished observations) and is hyperphosphorylated upon checkpoint activation (Hardwick and Murray, 1995
). The Mps1 kinase is required for the spindle
checkpoint and appears to directly phosphorylate Mad1
(Hardwick et al., 1996
; Weiss and Winey, 1996
). A combination of genetics and biochemical analyses placed BUB1, BUB3, and MPS1 upstream of MAD1 and MAD2 whereas
BUB2 and MAD3 would act downstream of these genes
(Hardwick and Murray, 1995
; Hardwick et al., 1996
). A
dominant allele of BUB1 has recently been identified
which activates the spindle checkpoint when overexpressed. Analysis of its overexpression in mad, bub, and
mps1 mutants suggests that the Bub1 and Mps1 kinases act
together at an early step in the checkpoint pathway, upstream of all the other Bub and Mad proteins (Farr and
Hoyt, 1998
).
In addition to gross alterations in spindle structure, the
budding yeast spindle checkpoint can also respond to low
doses of microtubule depolymerizing drugs, to defects induced by mutations in centromere-binding proteins or in
centromeric DNA, and to aberrantly segregating centromeres (for review see Rudner and Murray, 1996
). All of
these defects could interfere with kinetochore-microtubule attachment and a sensing system at kinetochores
would allow the checkpoint to monitor the whole process
of spindle assembly. Consistent with this idea, a phosphoepitope recognized by the monoclonal antibody 3F3 is
only present at unattached kinetochores in mammalian somatic cell lines (Gorbsky and Ricketts, 1993
). Furthermore, the vertebrate homologues of Mad2, Bub1, Mad3
and Bub3 all localize to unattached kinetochores (Chen et
al., 1996
; Li and Benezra, 1996
; Taylor and McKeon, 1997
;
Taylor et al., 1998
). It is not clear precisely how the spindle checkpoint monitors chromosome attachment. Checkpoints components could sense free microtubule binding
sites at kinetochores or the tension exerted within the kinetochore by spindle poleward forces or a combination
of both.
The most likely target of the spindle checkpoint is the
anaphase-promoting complex (APC)1 or cyclosome. The
APC acts as a ubiquitin-protein ligase to specifically mark
proteins consequently targeted for destruction by the proteasome (for review see King et al., 1996
). Activation of
the APC triggers anaphase by degrading inhibitors of sister chromatid separation like budding yeast Pds1 and fission yeast Cut2 (Cohen-Fix et al., 1996
; Funabiki et al.,
1996
) and allows cells to exit mitosis by degrading mitotic
cyclins and regulators of spindle structure such as Ase1
(Juang et al., 1997
). Recently, it was shown that Mad2 interacts directly with Slp1/Cdc20 (Hwang et al., 1998
; Kim et al., 1998
), which is thought to be a substrate-specific activator of APC-dependent proteolysis (He et al., 1997
; Li
et al., 1997
; Visintin et al., 1997
). It has been proposed that
when the spindle checkpoint is activated Mad2, most likely
in a complex with Mad1 and Mad3 (Hwang et al., 1998
),
represses the activity of Cdc20 and thus inhibits the metaphase-anaphase transition. The molecular mechanism of
this repression is not understood.
The centromere/kinetochore complex is a key element
in the process of mitosis. As well as the regulatory function
of monitoring chromosome attachment to the spindle, the
kinetochore carries out a number of mechanical functions.
These include sister chromatid cohesion, attachment of
sister chromatids to the spindle microtubules and the subsequent chromosome movements of metaphase and anaphase. In most eukaryotes, centromeric DNA consists of
long arrays of repetitive DNA packaged into transcriptionally silent, recombination cold, late-replicating, heterochromatin. The exact function of heterochromatin is
unknown but kinetochores in higher eukaryotes generally
form within centromeric heterochromatin (Karpen and Allshire, 1997
). In Schizosaccharomyces pombe three regions of the genome are known to assemble transcriptionally silent, heterochromatin-like structures. These are the
centromeres, the telomeres, and the silent mating-type loci
(Allshire et al., 1994
; Nimmo et al., 1994
; Thon et al.,
1994
). Mutations in clr4, rik1, and swi6 genes were shown
to affect repression at the silent mating-type loci, at centromeres, and to a limited extent at telomeres (Lorentz et
al., 1992
; Ekwall and Ruusala, 1994
; Allshire et al., 1995
). The swi6+ gene encodes a structural component of heterochromatin which localizes to centromeres, telomeres, and
the mating-type region and functional Rik1 and Clr4 are
required for this localization (Ekwall et al., 1995
, 1996
).
Although Swi6 is present at telomeres it does not appear
to play a crucial role in telomere function since mutations in the swi6 gene have little effect on telomere silencing
and do not affect telomere length nor telomere clustering
(Allshire et al., 1995
; Ekwall et al., 1996
). In addition, deletion of the swi6 gene induces an elevated loss rate of both
linear and circular minichromosomes, suggesting that Swi6
acts primarily at the centromere. Indeed, the lack of a
functional swi6+ gene causes centromeres to lag on anaphase spindles (Ekwall et al., 1995
). From these observations, it has been proposed that cells devoid of a functional
swi6 gene assemble a compromised centromere (Ekwall et
al., 1996
).
In order to uncover new centromere proteins, we looked for loci that genetically interact with swi6 through a synthetic lethal screen. One of the mutants identified was found to bear a mutation in a gene homologous to budding yeast BUB1. We show that S. pombe bub1+ is required to detect alterations in spindle structure or defects in kinetochore function. Activation of the checkpoint results in the recruitment of Bub1 to centromeres and the introduction of a delay in the completion of mitosis. Through genetic and cytological observations we show that the loss of the bub1 gene causes defects in chromosome segregation, providing clear evidence that Bub1 function is also required in a normal, unperturbed mitosis. Immunofluorescence analyses indicate that Bub1 is systematically recruited to centromeres during the prophase and prometaphase stages of normal mitosis. In metaphase, a fraction of the Bub1 pool is released from centromeres but surprisingly, some remains centromere associated until cytokinesis raising the possibility of a role for Bub1 at kinetochores past the metaphase-anaphase transition.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strains, Media, Transformation and Genetic Techniques
All the strains used in this study are listed in Table I. Media were essentially as described by Moreno et al. (1991)
and Allshire et al. (1994)
. Synthetic minimal medium is PMG. PMGthi is PMG 20 µM thiamine. When
appropriate, media were supplemented with 0.1 g/liter of leucine (L),
uracil (U), adenine (A), and histidine (H). When required, Phloxin B was
added to the media (2.5 mg/l) to stain colonies containing dead cells. YES
refers to yeast extract medium supplemented with LUAH. YES 1/10A is
supplemented with a limiting amount of adenine (0.01 g/liter) to allow the development of the red and pink colors of ade6-210 and ade6-216 colonies. Transformation and genetic techniques were as described (Moreno
et al., 1991
). Minichromosome loss rates were measured as described
(Allshire et al., 1995
). Briefly, cells from white colonies formed on a YES
1/10A plate were harvested, diluted in water, plated on YES 1/10A, and
then incubated 4 d at 32°C. The rate of minichromosome loss per division
is the number of colonies with a red sector covering at least half of the colony divided by the total number of white colonies plus half-sectored colonies.
|
DNA Manipulations and Plasmid Constructions
DNA manipulations were performed according to standard procedures. Sequencing was done by Genome express S.A. (Grenoble, France) on double-stranded templates using an Applied Biosystems 373XL sequencer (Foster City, CA). The fission yeast B1 genomic library made in pUR19 (S. pombe ura4+ gene as selection marker) was provided by A.M. Carr (Medical Research Council Cell Mutation Unit, Brighton, UK).
pREP41swi6 Construction.
A SmaI-NsiI 2.35-kbp fragment from pAL2
(Lorentz et al., 1994
) bearing the swi6+ gene was inserted between the
HindII and PstI sites of pBluescript SK. The entire swi6+ open reading
frame (ORF), including 5' and 3' untranslated regions, was cut out as a
1.3-kbp SspI-BamHI fragment and cloned between the NdeI filled-in/
BamHI sites of pREP41 (Basi et al., 1993
) to yield pREP41swi6.
Construction of pbub1-6HA. A 540-bp fragment was generated by PCR using oligonucleotides bub1-3' in (5'-GGAATTCGCGGCCGCAAATTTTTCTTTTTTCGATGC-3') and bub1-Xba out (5'-ACTTCTTCGTCTAGAAACCG-3'). This fragment contains a XbaI site at the 5' end, the last 178 codons of bub1+ without the stop codon and a NotI site and a EcoRI site at the 3' end. A 220-bp fragment was amplified using primers bub1-3' out (5'-GGAATTCTAATTTTTTGCCTAGAGG-3') and bub1-3' out (5'-GCATGCATATTGCAGGTTTG-3'). This fragment contains an EcoRI site at the 5' end, a STOP codon followed by 200 bp of bub1+ 3' untranslated regions, and a NsiI site at the 3' end. The two PCR products were cut with EcoRI, ligated together, and then cut with XbaI and NsiI and cloned between the XbaI and PstI sites of pUC19ura4 (S. pombe ura4+ cloned into the SphI site of pUC19). Finally, six copies of the hemagglutinin (HA) sequence were inserted into the NotI site to give pbub1-6HA.
p
bub1::ura4+ and p
bub1::LEU2 Construction.
The 3787-bp BamHI-SphI fragment containing the bub1+ gene was cloned into pBluescript SK
to give pSKbub1+. The S. pombe ura4+ gene cloned into the HindIII site
of pBluescript SK was cut out with SalI and SpeI and cloned into XhoI-SpeI-digested pSKbub1+ to give p
bub1::ura4+. Similarly, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae LEU2 gene cloned into the HindIII site of pBluescript
SK was cut out with SalI and SpeI and cloned into XhoI-SpeI-digested
pSKbub1+ to give p
bub1::LEU2.
Strain Constructions
Strain 57. pREP41swi6 was linearized with MluI (within ars1 sequences in pREP41) and transformed into strain 423. Single copy integrants at the ars1 locus were screened by Southern blotting.
bub1::ura4+ strains were obtained by transformation with the 3.2-kb
BamHI-SphI fragment from p
bub1::ura4+.
bub1::LEU2 strains were
made by transformation with the BamHI-SphI fragment from p
bub1::
LEU2. All strains were checked by Southern blotting.
Strain 411. pbub1-6HA was cut with the single ClaI site lying within bub1+ sequences and transformed into strain 77. Southern blotting was used to identify a strain with the expected structure.
Isolation of the bub1-118 Mutant
Strain 57 was mutagenized with ethylmethane sulfonate as described
(Moreno et al., 1991
). Mutagenized cells were plated onto PMGLUA
plates and incubated at 32°C until colony formation. Colonies were then
replica-plated onto PMGLUAthi phloxinB and PMGLUA phloxinB and
incubated at 32°C for 2-3 d. Colonies that stained dark red on the thiamine-containing plates were selected. Mutant strains were backcrossed at
least three times. From ~120,000 colonies screened, seven mutants were
isolated. All seven mutants were recessive and defined five genes named
ssl1 to ssl5 (swi6 synthetic lethal). The ssl5 gene was renamed bub1. It is
represented by a single allele, ssl5-118 which was renamed bub1-118.
Cloning of bub1+
bub1-118 was found to be tightly linked to ade6 on chromosome III. To isolate the bub1+ gene, strain 139 was transformed with the genomic DNA library, selecting for adenine prototrophy. Ade+ transformants were screened for ability to grow onto thiamine containing medium. Among the complementing plasmids, p115bub1+ had the smallest genomic insert and was used for subcloning.
Elutriation and H1 Kinase Assays
Cultures were grown overnight in YES to 5 × 106 cells/ml and then loaded
onto a JE-5.0 Beckman elutriation rotor (Palo Alto, CA). Small G2 cells
were then shifted to 18°C and time points taken at 1-h intervals. Cells
were fixed with 70% ethanol, before washing with PEM (100 mM Pipes,
pH 6.9, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgSO4) and staining with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and calcofluor. Cell samples for kinase assays were
taken and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Extracts were made by bead-beating
in lysis buffer containing 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.6, 80 mM Na-
-glycerophosphate, 50 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 20 mM EGTA, 2 mM Na vanadate, 1 mM
DTT, 0.5% Triton, 1 mM PMSF, and 1 µg/ml of leupeptin, pepstatin, and
chymostatin. Extracts were then spun in a microfuge at 6,000 rpm for 5 min to remove beads and insoluble material, before protein concentrations were measured (Bio-Rad assay; Hercules, CA) and equalized. 1 µl of extract was added to a 10 µl kinase assay containing 80 mM Na-
-glycerophosphate, pH 7.4, 15 mM MgCl2, 20 mM EGTA, 2 µg histone H1
(Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), 1 µCi of
-32P-ATP, 200 µM ATP, and 1 mM DTT. Kinase assays were incubated for 15 min at
30°C, stopped by adding an equal volume of 2× SDS sample buffer, and
then separated by 15% SDS PAGE. Gels were stained, fixed, and then
dried and the relative levels of H1 kinase activity determined by autoradiography.
Cytological Techniques
Immunostaining was as described previously (Ekwall et al., 1996
) with
some modifications. Briefly, cells were fixed in 1.2 M sorbitol, 1.7%
paraformaldehyde for 40 min. Incubation with anti-HA antibodies and
secondary antibodies were performed for 3-16 h in PEMBAL in which
BSA was replaced with 5% (wt/vol) nonfat dry milk. Monoclonal anti-HA
16B12 (Berkeley Antibody, Berkeley, CA) was used at a 1:400 dilution,
affinity-purified rabbit anti-HA Y-11 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa
Cruz, CA) at 1:50, and anti-
-tubulin monoclonal antibody TAT1
(Woods et al., 1989
) at 1:20. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was
as described (Ekwall et al., 1996
) using the centromere probe pRS140 (Takahashi et al., 1992
). Fluorescence microscopy was done using a Leica
DMRXA microscope (St. Gallen, Switzerland). Images were captured
with a Princeton charge-coupled device camera (Princeton, NJ) and processed with the Metamorph software. Figures were mounted using Adobe
Photoshop 4.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA). In the montages from Fig.
4, different exposure times were used for the Bub1 signal, depending on
the brightness of the subject. In particular, the exposure time or signal intensity were reduced for prophase and prometaphase cells to minimize
halo formation around intense Bub1 signals. Length measurements were
done using the Metamorph software (Universal Imaging, West Chester, PA).
|
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of the bub1+ Gene
In order to identify genes involved in mitotic centromere
function, we performed a screen for mutants inviable in
the absence of the centromere protein Swi6. Seven mutants were isolated defining five complementation groups.
The bub1-118 mutation was found to be tightly linked to
ade6 on chromosome III and this linkage was exploited to
clone the bub1+ gene (Materials and Methods). Bub1+ resides within a 3,769-bp BamHI-SphI fragment which was
fully sequenced (GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number AF064796). A start codon was found at position 433, followed by an uninterrupted ORF encoding a predicted
1,044-amino acid protein with a calculated molecular mass
of 113,363 D and a pI of 6.22. Database searches using the
BLAST program (Altschul et al., 1990) revealed that the
predicted peptide was similar to the budding yeast spindle checkpoint serine/threonine protein kinase encoded by
BUB1 (Roberts et al., 1994
). A significant match was also
found with Bub1 homologues from Drosophila (P = 6.5 × 10
30), human (P = 3.1 × 10
29), and mouse (P = 2.5 × 10
28). Fig. 1 A shows the alignment of fission yeast Bub1
with S. cerevisiae and mouse proteins. The best conserved
region resides in the COOH terminus kinase domain. In
particular, lysine 762 which was shown to be essential for
kinase activity and Bub1 function in budding yeast is conserved in all three proteins (Roberts et al., 1994
). In addition, there is a well-conserved region towards the NH2 terminus of Bub1 which is conserved in all three Bub1 proteins, and in the human Bub1-related protein and budding yeast Mad3 (Fig. 1 B). In fact it was this region of homology which led one of us (K.G. Hardwick) to first identify the fission yeast bub1+ gene in BLAST searches of
sequence databases. The molecular function of this domain remains unclear: it is close to, but nevertheless distinct from the recently defined Bub3 interaction domain
(Taylor et al., 1998
) (Hardwick, K.G., unpublished observations on Mad3).
|
Fission Yeast Bub1 Is an Essential Component of the Spindle Checkpoint
A null allele was made by replacing the entire bub1+ ORF
either with the ura4+ or LEU2 genes. The resulting haploid strains are viable showing that bub1+ is not essential
for cell viability. In budding yeast,
bub1 strains are viable
but hypersensitive to microtubule-depolymerizing agents
such a nocodazole or benomyl owing to the loss of a functional spindle checkpoint (Hoyt et al., 1991
; Roberts et al.,
1994
). As shown in Fig. 2 A, the bub1-118 and
bub1
strains at 32°C are unable to form colonies on medium
containing 7.5 µg/ml benomyl whereas the wild-type control strain still does. A
swi6 strain was also included in
the experiment. Cells devoid of Swi6 are known to be hypersensitive to benomyl presumably as a result of an altered interaction of weakened kinetochores with spindle
microtubules (Ekwall et al., 1996
). Interestingly, the
bub1
strain showed the same pattern of benomyl sensitivity as
the
swi6 strain (Fig. 2 A). Sensitivity to a spindle poison
can arise either from a structural defect in the spindle/
kinetochore or from the loss of the spindle checkpoint.
The two classes of defects should be distinguishable since
the former are checkpoint proficient and should be able to
halt cell cycle progression in response to spindle damage
whereas the latter should not. To investigate whether
bub1 and
swi6 have a functional mitotic checkpoint we
asked whether mutant strains can arrest their cell cycle in
the absence of a spindle. To prevent spindle formation, we
used nda3KM311, a cold-sensitive mutation in the
-tubulin gene. When shifted to the restrictive temperature,
nda3KM311 cells accumulate with condensed chromosomes, single spindle pole body, a high level of histone H1
kinase activity, and unseparated sister chromatids (Hiraoka et al., 1984
; Kanbe et al., 1990
; Moreno et al., 1989
;
Funabiki et al., 1993
). We synchronized cultures of the different nda3 mutant strains by elutriation, and Fig. 2 B
shows that when shifted to the cold,
swi6 nda3KM311
cells arrest with high levels of H1 kinase activity whereas
the kinase activity drops rapidly in
bub1 nda3KM311
cells. The drop in kinase activity is accompanied by a wave
of septation (Fig. 2 C), confirming that the
bub1 nda3
KM311 cells are progressing through the cell cycle. The
effects of such cell cycle progression in the absence of a
spindle are readily apparent: several of the checkpoint-defective cells display the classic cut (cell untimely torn)
phenotype because they fail to segregate their DNA to the two daughter cells prior to septation (Fig. 2 D). In stark
contrast to this the
swi6 nda3KM311 cells do not septate
and remain arrested with hypercondensed chromosomes
(data not shown). An elutriated nda3KM311 control culture behaved like the
swi6 nda3KM311 strain (data not
shown).
|
From this experiment we concluded that
bub1 cells are
deficient for the spindle checkpoint whereas the checkpoint is functional in
swi6 cells. To further investigate the
consequences of the loss of a functional bub1+ gene, we
asked whether sister chromatids separate when
bub1 nda3KM311 cells are shifted to the cold. Cells from bub1+
nda3KM311 and
bub1 nda3KM311 strains were grown to
early log phase at 32°C and then transfered to 18°C. Aliquots of the cultures where fixed at 1, 5, and 15 h and then
processed for FISH using a probe detecting all three centromeres (cenFISH). Fig. 2 E shows an nda3KM311 cell
displaying three separate cenFISH signals. Those cells represented only a fraction of cells with condensed chromatin (Table II) because the chromosomes have to diffuse away
from each other to show separate cenFISH signals. No
more than three spots could be detected in bub1+ nda3
KM311 cells even 15 h after the shift to 18°C, showing that sister chromatid cohesion is maintained in those cells. By
contrast, cells with more than three spots were readily detected in
bub1 nda3KM311 (Fig. 2 E, right). They first
appeared 1 h after the temperature shift and rose throughout the course of the experiment (Table II). In cells with
more than three spots the DNA always appeared decondensed, consistent with an exit from mitosis. It should be
mentioned that the proportion of cells with separated sisters is likely to be underestimated since, as mentioned
above, individual chromosomes or chromatids must diffuse away from each other to produce separate cenFISH
signals. Although not quantitative, this experiment clearly
demonstrates that sister chromatid separation occurs in
bub1 cells in the absence of a spindle.
|
The above experiments show that Bub1 is an essential component of the fission yeast spindle checkpoint. In the absence of a mitotic spindle, cells with a nonfunctional bub1 gene fail to maintain sister chromatid cohesion and high levels of H1 kinase activity, and as a result they exit mitosis with unsegregated chromosomes.
bub1+ Function Is Required for High Fidelity Segregation of Chromosomes in Normal Mitosis
As shown above, Bub1 function is essential to prevent
chromosome segregation in the absence of a spindle. Next,
we asked whether Bub1 is also required for normal mitosis. This was assayed by measuring the fidelity of chromosome segregation. The rate of chromosome loss was estimated by scoring the mitotic loss rate of the 530-kb linear
minichromosome Ch16 (Matsumoto et al., 1990
) using the
half-sectoring assay method (Allshire et al., 1995
). In wild-type cells, Ch16 loss rate is less than 0.1% of cell divisions (Allshire et al., 1995
). As a functional bub1+ gene was
present on Ch16, we constructed Ch16
bub1, a Ch16
derivative in which the bub1+ gene was deleted. Chromosome loss assays demonstrated that Ch16
bub1 is as
stable as the original Ch16 in an otherwise wild-type background (Table III). By contrast, the minichromosome was
lost in 3.5% of cell divisions in
bub1 cells, showing that
the loss of bub1+ function causes a 70-fold increase in
Ch16 loss over wild-type.
|
Similarly, loss of bub1+ function induced an elevated
loss rate of CM3112, a circular minichromosome bearing a
functional centromere derived from chromosome III (Matsumoto et al., 1990
). The loss rate was up to 20% (Table
III), a value similar to the loss rate of acentric or ars plasmids in fission yeast (Heyer et al., 1986
; Matsumoto et al.,
1990
). Therefore, the mitotic segregation of CM3112 is almost completely disrupted in cells lacking bub1+ function.
To investigate whether the segregation of regular chromosomes was also affected, we looked at the rate of breakdown of a diploid homozygous for the bub1 deletion.
Chromosome missegregation events in a diploid generate
aneuploid cells. As fission yeast cells are highly sensitive to
aneuploidy (Niwa and Yanagida, 1985
), aneuploids are
unstable and return rapidly to the haploid state. Thus the
rate of diploid breakdown can be used to estimate the rate
of whole chromosome loss (Allshire et al., 1995
). Diploids were forced by intragenic complementation between the
ade6-210 (red) and ade6-216 (pink) alleles. Ade+ cells
were harvested from a plate lacking adenine and plated onto YES medium containing a limiting amount of adenine to allow the development of colored (haploid) colonies. As shown in Fig. 3 A, cells from the bub1+/bub1+
strain formed pure white (diploid) colonies and very few
colored (haploid) colonies (the rate of breakdown is
<10
3/cell division, Allshire et al., 1995
). By contrast, cells
from the
bub1/
bub1 strain never formed white colonies
but exclusively pink (ade6-216), red (ade6-210), or mixed
pink/red haploid colonies. The extreme instability of the
diploid precluded any precise measurement of the rate of
breakdown. However, since white colonies never formed
in the absence of selection for Ade+ cells, one can conclude that bub1+ function is essential for chromosome stability in diploid cells.
|
We next investigated whether defects in chromosome
segregation could be seen by cytological observation of
mitotic cells. Strains 77 (bub1+) and 393 (
bub1) were
grown to early log phase at 26°C, fixed, and then processed
for immunofluorescence microscopy. DAPI and anti-tubulin antibody staining visualized nuclear chromatin and microtubules, respectively. The most striking observation in
bub1 mutants was the presence of unsegregated chromosomes at anaphase (Fig. 3 B, top left). In ~10% of late
anaphase cells (Table IV), a chromatin mass remained
near the spindle midzone whereas the bulk of chromatin
had already reached the spindle poles. Lagging chromosomes were never observed in wild-type anaphase B cells.
|
A similar experiment was performed with diploid strains.
Cells from bub1+/bub1+ and
bub1/
bub1 Ade+ colonies
were inoculated into complete medium, grown to early log
phase and processed for immunofluorescence. As
bub1/
bub1 diploids were extremely unstable, the cell population was composed of a majority of haploid cells and very
few diploid cells. Nevertheless, the latter could be identified unambiguously by their larger size. Among late-anaphase
bub1/
bub1 cells, 45% (52 out of 116) showed lagging chromosomes (Fig. 3 B, bottom left) whereas cells
with lagging chromosomes were rarely (5 out of 600) observed in bub1+/bub1+ late-anaphase cells.
The above results clearly demonstrate that bub1+ function is required for high fidelity chromosome segregation during normal mitosis. It is unclear why diploid cells are so sensitive to the loss of bub1+ function. One possibility is that diploid mitosis relies more heavily on the spindle checkpoint than haploid mitosis simply because in a diploid there are more chromosomes and hence more kinetochores to be captured by the mitotic apparatus.
Cellular Localization of Bub1
Strain 411 was constructed in which the bub1+ gene is appended with six copies of the HA epitope. The strain displayed the same benomyl sensitivity as a bub1+ strain, showing that the tagged protein was functional (data not shown). To localize the protein in the cell, two anti-HA antibodies were used: a mouse monoclonal antibody (mHA) and an affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal serum (rHA). The monoclonal always gave the best staining and allowed the finest observations whereas rHA was used for double staining with the anti-tubulin antibody to identify the cell cycle stage. Whatever the anti-HA antibody used, no staining was seen on untagged fixed cells (data not shown).
Fig. 4 A shows cells stained with rHA and tubulin. A series of frames are shown which recapitulate the stages of the cell cycle from interphase through mitosis. In interphase cells (panel a), rHA staining was diffused through the nucleus with some faint spots around the nuclear periphery. When cells enter mitosis (panel b), rHA systematically produced a single bright spot of fluorescence colocalizing with the prophase spindle (spindle length <1 µm). In prometaphase cells (spindle length <2 µm), two bright Bub1 spots were seen, always positioned along the spindle axis (panels c and d).
In most cases when cells approached metaphase (spindle length >2 µm and unsegregated DNA) there was an abrupt reduction in the Bub1 staining intensity (Fig. 4 A, panel e), although intense signals were sometimes observed. Among 150 metaphase cells examined, five retained an intense staining pattern (one, two, or three bright spots) but the vast majority (145) showed weakly stained foci (Fig. 4 A, panel e) and a diffuse labelling of the chromatin. Therefore, in a normal mitosis the intense staining pattern of Bub1 is restricted to prophase and prometaphase and is lost when cells reach metaphase. In anaphase cells (Fig. 4 A, f and g), some of the signal appeared to trail behind the separating chromatin masses but discrete spots could also be seen leading the separating chromatin masses, suggesting that a fraction of the Bub1 pool is at the kinetochores in anaphase. At telophase (Fig. 4 A, panel h) the interphase pattern reappeared.
We next looked at the localization of Bub-HA relative
to centromeres (Fig. 4 B). Cells were stained with mHA
and centromeres were detected by cenFISH. In interphase
fission yeast cells, all three centromeres are clustered close
to the spindle pole body at the nuclear periphery (Funabiki et al., 1993
). mHA in those cells (Fig. 4 B, panel a)
produced multiple faint spots at the nuclear periphery.
Most cells examined (41 out of 49) did not show any colocalization of Bub1 with the cenFISH signal. In prophase cells, three major patterns of cenFISH staining were observed (Fig. 4 B, panels b-d). The most common pattern
(39 out of 60) was a single cenFISH signal colocalizing
with the HA spot (Fig. 4 B, panel b). Less frequently (19 out of 60) two FISH signals were seen with the HA spot
localized in between the two FISH signals (Fig. 4 B, panel
c). Rarely (2 out of 60), the three centromeres could be detected separately and in those cases they were located around the HA spot (Fig. 4 B, panel d). In cells with two
intense HA signals (Fig. 4 B, panel e), the distance between the two spots was always short (mean value 0.47 ± 0.06 µm). For these cells, the major pattern (37 out of 47)
was a single cenFISH signal between the two HA spots. In
some cells (10 out of 47), two cenFISH signals were observed, overlapping with the HA signals (data not shown). In metaphase cells (Fig. 4 B, panel f), the intense pattern
of staining was lost but some punctate staining was still
present and colocalized with the centromeres. In cells having completed anaphase (Fig. 4 B, panels g-i), some HA
staining colocalized with the centromeres at the spindle
poles but the bulk of the signal was not centromere-associated and formed a string-like structure between the separating chromatin masses (Fig. 4 B, panel h) which eventually disappeared in late anaphase B cells (Fig. 4 B, panel i).
In septated cells (Fig. 4 B, panel j) the interphase pattern
reappeared.
To summarize, Bub1 in interphase is distributed in several foci at the nuclear periphery which are distinct from centromeres. When cells enter mitosis Bub1 is recruited to the centromeres, which are still clustered close to the SPBs at this early stage, and the staining becomes much more intense. In prometaphase, Bub1 usually forms two masses aligned along the spindle with the centromeres located in between. In metaphase, Bub1 appeared more diffuse but a fraction of Bub1 is still associated with the centromeres. In anaphase A and B the bulk of Bub1 is distinct from centromeres and follows the movement of the chromatin masses but a fraction of Bub1 remains centromere-associated until telophase.
Next we looked at the localization of Bub1 in cells arrested in prometaphase in response to the absence of a spindle. Cells from strain 415 (nda3KM311 bub1-6HA) were grown to early log phase at 32°C, shifted to 18°C for 8 h, and then fixed and processed for anti-HA immunofluorescence and cenFISH. After 8 h at restrictive temperature, cells were arrested with condensed chromosomes. In some instances, the chromosomes had diffused away from each other, allowing individual chromosomes to be seen by DAPI staining (Fig. 5). The cell at the top of the image shows three intense Bub1-HA signals colocalizing with the centromeres. Strikingly, some cells displayed paired foci of Bub1-HA staining rather than well-defined spots. In the bottom of the two cells shown in Fig. 5, all three spots were actually doublets. This pattern of staining was routinely seen in nda3-arrested cells but most often, only one or two chromosomes displayed paired Bub1 foci. Cells with three single spots represented ~63%, cells with one doublet and two spots 24%, two doublets one spot 25%, and three doublets 2%. The appearance of a doublet was not due to sister chromatid separation since the centromeric signal remained single, located in between the paired Bub1 foci. Such a staining pattern is consistent with Bub1 being associated with sister kinetochores. The mean distance between the two signals in a doublet was 0.42 ± 0.04 µm, which is strikingly similar to the distance separating the two Bub1 foci during the prometaphase stage of cycling cells. This suggests that the paired Bub1 structures observed in cycling cells are also formed by the close proximity of the sister kinetochores from all three chromosomes which are aligned on the spindle axis.
|
Bub1 Is Required to Detect and Correct Defects in Centromere Function
The bub1-118 mutant was identified in a screen for colethality with
swi6. The Swi6 protein is a structural component of fission yeast heterochromatin. As pointed out in
the introduction, the Swi6 protein has only a minor role
if any at telomeres but appears crucial for normal centromere function since the lack of a functional swi6+ gene
is correlated with a defective movement of centromeres at anaphase and an elevated rate of chromosome loss (Allshire et al., 1995
; Ekwall et al., 1996
). Therefore, the lethality of the
swi6
bub1 double mutant suggests that the
Bub1 checkpoint pathway is required to monitor defects in
centromere function. If this is indeed the case, the lethality
of the double mutant is expected to arise from a complete
failure to segregate chromosomes. To test this prediction,
we performed a cytological analysis of
bub1 cells in
which the synthetic lethality was induced by depletion of
Swi6.
Strain 57 carries the swi6+ ORF under the control of the
nmt promoter (nmtswi6) which is repressible by addition
of thiamine to the culture medium (Maundrell, 1990
). In
the absence of thiamine, Swi6 is expressed and the strain
behaves as a swi6+ strain. Addition of thiamine into the
medium represses nmt and after 8-10 generations, Swi6 is
depleted and defective anaphases appear (Table V) with a
frequency similar to that observed in a
swi6 strain grown
at 32°C (data not shown). Strain 399 carries the
bub1 allele in a nmtswi6 background. When Swi6 is produced, the
frequency of defective anaphases was ~7.4% (Table V),
close to the value obtained for the bub1-deleted strain. 20 h
after the addition of thiamine, when Swi6 was depleted,
the fraction of abnormal anaphases represented up to 50%
of late anaphase cells. The image shown in Fig. 6 shows a
field of cells in which all anaphase cells display lagging
chromosomes and/or obvious unequal segregation of the
chromatin masses. Therefore, the lethality of the
swi6
bub1 double mutant is likely to be a consequence of massive chromosome missegregation events. As a functional
bub1+ gene is required for the viability of a
swi6 cell, this
suggests that Bub1 is somehow able to compensate for the
centromere defect induced by the lack of Swi6. How can
this be achieved? To address this question, we looked at
Bub1 localization in a
swi6 background. Cells from strain
429 (
swi6 bub1-6HA) were grown to early log phase at
26°C and processed for anti-tubulin and anti-HA immunofluorescence. The Bub1 staining patterns in prophase
and prometaphase were similar to that observed in a wild-type background (Fig. 7 A, top and middle) showing that
the lack of Swi6 does not grossly affect the localization of
Bub1. However, a large fraction of metaphase cells displayed an intense punctate staining (Fig. 7 A, bottom). Examination of 103 metaphase
swi6 cells (spindle length
greater than 2 µm and unsegregated DNA) revealed that
49 (47.5%) were devoid of intense Bub1-HA staining but
54 (52.5%) displayed one, two, or three intense Bub1-HA
signals. This is in sharp contrast with what was observed in
a swi6+ background where only five metaphase cells from
150 examined (3.4%) retained an intense Bub1-staining
pattern.
|
|
|
Examination of Bub1-stained postmetaphase cells did
not reveal any significant difference between swi6+ and
swi6 strains. Of interest was the Bub1 staining status of lagging chromosomes in
swi6 anaphase cells. In all cells
examined (100), lagging chromosomes did not show any
intense Bub1 staining but a rather diffuse labelling of the
lagging chromatin (Fig. 7 B). The weak, diffuse signal on
the lagging chromosomes is not due to poor immunofluorescence since, like in wild-type anaphases, Bub1 can be
seen leading the separated main chromatin masses (Fig. 7 B).
Taken together, these observations are consistent with the idea that, in early mitosis, Bub1 is recruited to centromeres not yet bound to microtubules but this ability is lost past the metaphase-anaphase transition since aberrantly segregating centromeres at anaphase do not recruit Bub1.
Next we asked whether the dramatic recruitment of
Bub1 in
swi6 metaphases could be correlated with the introduction of a cell cycle delay. As shown in Table VI, the
fraction of metaphase cells is doubled in a
swi6 background. This increase in metaphase cells is statistically
highly significant (P < 0.01 by the Chi squared test).
Therefore, cells harboring a compromised centromere spent twice the normal amount of time in metaphase. It
should be noted that there is also an increase in the fraction of late mitotic cells in
swi6 compared to wild type.
Although these data are at the borderline of statistical significance (P < 0.05) they suggest that the duration of
anaphase and/or telophase is also increased in
swi6 cells.
|
From these observations, we conclude that cells in which centromeres are weakened by the absence of the Swi6 protein are delayed in metaphase and this delay correlates with the persistence of an intense punctate Bub1 staining. This suggests that misattached kinetochores activate the checkpoint through the recruitment of Bub1 and as a consequence anaphase is delayed.
The above observations suggest that Bub1 is able to
slow cell cycle progression when it is recruited to centromeres. In wild-type cycling cells, intense Bub1 staining
is observed in prophase and prometaphase. Thus, if Bub1
acts to control the timing of normal mitosis, one might expect
bub1 cells to pass more quickly through mitosis. As
shown in Table VI, there is a modest decrease in prophase and prometaphase cells in the
bub1 strain as compared
to wild type, but the difference is not statistically significant. Therefore, the loss of bub1+ function does not appear to grossly alter the timing of mitosis.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have shown that fission bub1+ encodes a mitotic centromere protein which is an essential component of the
spindle checkpoint. Vertebrate homologues of several
checkpoint proteins, namely Mad2, Mad3, Bub1, and Bub3
have all been shown to localize to unattached kinetochores leading to the idea that microtubule-free kinetochores attract checkpoint components which in turn inhibit or delay cell cycle progression. Our data fully support
this idea. Immunofluorescence analysis reveals that Bub1
is massively recruited to centromeres during the early
stages of mitosis when kinetochores are not yet captured
by microtubules, and when microtubule polymerization is
prevented by a mutation in
-tubulin. In cells lacking the centromere protein Swi6, kinetochores are thought to be
less efficient in capturing microtubules, and we found that
in those cells the intense Bub1 staining persists in metaphase. Conversely, in wild-type cells the Bub1 staining is
diminished in metaphase when all kinetochores have been
captured. Thus, intense Bub1 staining at centromeres correlates well with the presence of microtubule-free kinetochores. There is also a good correlation between the centromeric recruitment of Bub1 and the introduction of a
cell cycle delay. The prometaphase arrest of nda3KM311
cells at 18°C is dependent upon a functional bub1+ gene
and is characterized by a strong Bub1 staining at kinetochores. Similarly, cells devoid of a functional swi6+ gene
show metaphases with intense Bub1 staining and spend
twice the normal amount of time in metaphase. Therefore,
our data suggest that microtubule-free kinetochores attract Bub1 which in turn delays the onset of anaphase.
Although the above is true when kinetochore or spindle
function is compromised, the situation is less clear in an
unperturbed mitosis since the lack of a functional bub1+
gene does not appear to shorten the early stages of mitosis. It is possible that kinetochore capture in mitosis is normally a very efficient process which is completed well before full activation of the APC. However, we found that in
cells lacking bub1+ function ~13% of anaphases displayed
lagging chromosomes, suggesting that stable kinetochore
capture had not been achieved in a significant fraction of
metaphases. In addition, it has been reported that overexpression of a dominant-negative form of mouse Bub1
in HeLa cells shortens mitosis by 25 min (Taylor and
McKeon, 1997
). Live analysis of mitosis in individual fission yeast cells will be necessary to address this proposed
mitotic timing function for Bub1 more carefully.
Overexpression of Bub1 in budding yeast results in a nuclear accumulation, but unfortunately the protein could
not be detected in wild-type cells (Roberts et al., 1994
).
The mouse Bub1 protein is recruited to kinetochores in
early mitosis but dissociates in metaphase and is thus absent from kinetochores later in mitosis (Taylor and McKeon, 1997
). Similarly in S. pombe, kinetochores are
brightly stained with Bub1 in prophase and prometaphase
and the intense signal is then lost in metaphase. However,
some staining remains centromere associated in metaphase and throughout the final stages of mitosis, raising
the possibility that Bub1 might have a role at kinetochores
in anaphase. Such staining is reminiscent of that recently
reported for p55Cdc20, the vertebrate homologue of budding yeast Cdc20 and fission yeast Slp1, both of which
have been proposed to be effectors of the spindle checkpoint (Hwang et al., 1998
; Kallio et al., 1998
; Kim et al.,
1998
). Cdc20/Slp1 are essential genes required for the proteolytic destruction of a number of proteins including regulators of sister-chromatid separation (Pds1/Cut2) and the
mitotic cyclins. Their precise roles and interaction with the
APC remain unclear, but it has been reported (Kallio et al.,
1998
) that p55Cdc20 can be immunoprecipitated with
components of the APC (Cdc27) and the spindle checkpoint (Mad2). Further biochemical work is necessary to
determine whether this is true in fission yeast and if so
whether Bub1 is also present in such complexes.
One explanation for the anaphase localization of Bub1
at kinetochores could be that it also has a nonessential,
structural function within the kinetochore. For example,
Bub1 might increase the kinetochore's affinity for microtubules thereby promoting kinetochore capture and
strengthening the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle. Lagging chromosomes in cells lacking bub1+ could
arise from the combined effects of the lack of a functional checkpoint and a weakened kinetochore. Alternatively, a
late role for Bub1 could also be restricted to a checkpoint
function. Intriguingly, cells deleted for swi6+ do show an
increased proportion of anaphase cells, suggesting that
they activate a checkpoint which operates past the metaphase-anaphase transition. For instance, lagging chromosomes in anaphase cells could activate a checkpoint to
delay cytokinesis. A cytokinesis checkpoint has recently
been reported in budding yeast (Muhua et al., 1998
). However, the existence of such a checkpoint in fission yeast
and any involvement of Bub1 remain speculative. In addition, lagging chromosomes in
swi6 cells were not intensely Bub1 stained, suggesting that unattached kinetochores are unable to activate the spindle checkpoint past
the metaphase-anaphase transition.
The existence of lagging chromosomes in
swi6 cells
raises the question of the effectiveness of the checkpoint
in preventing missegregation events. The survival of
swi6
cells is dependent upon a functional bub1 gene showing
that the checkpoint is required to correct the defect induced by the lack of Swi6. However, the rescue is only partial since a fraction of anaphase cells show lagging chromosomes. Why do these missegregations events escape the
checkpoint? Experiments in budding yeast have shown
that mutations in the essential kinetochore component
Ndc10 abrogated the spindle checkpoint (Tavormina and
Burke, 1998
), leading to the idea that a kinetochore has to
be formed to recruit checkpoint components. It is possible
that the lack of Swi6 produces a heterogenous population of centromeres with respect to kinetochore function. One
class would have compromised centromeres with some residual kinetochore and checkpoint function and the other
class would have disrupted kinetochores which, like ndc10
kinetochores, would remain undetected by the checkpoint
and would generate lagging chromosomes at anaphase. This scenario could also explain why we did not observe
any recruitment of Bub1 to the centromeres of lagging
chromosomes. Further experiments are thus needed to investigate a possible role for Bub1 during the final stages of
mitosis.
In light of recent results, it has been suggested that mutational inactivation of the spindle checkpoint might play
an important role in the progression of human cancer.
Some cancers are associated with a chromosomal instability phenotype (CIN) leading to aneuploidy. It has been
proposed that checkpoint defects might lead to aneuploidy (Hartwell and Kastan, 1994
) and that this would then be
instrumental in tumorigenesis through the loss of tumor-suppressor genes (Orr-Weaver and Weinberg, 1998
). Cahill and colleagues showed that CIN in colorectal cancers
is correlated with the loss of the spindle checkpoint and,
in a number of cases, is associated with a mutation in
hBUB1, the human homologue of budding yeast BUB1
(Cahill et al., 1998
). These results suggest that aneuploidy
is due to the lack of a functional checkpoint.
bub1 spores
in budding yeast grow very slowly and often fail to form
colonies, but when propagated this growth phenotype reverts possibly due to the accumulation of suppressor mutations (Roberts et al., 1994
). To our knowledge a quantitative rate of chromosome loss has not been reported for such budding yeast strains. Overexpression of the dominant-negative mouse Bub1 construct may have affected
mitotic timing, but it did not appear to have a significant
effect on chromosome segregation (Taylor and McKeon,
1997
). We have shown that haploid S. pombe
bub1 strains
lose a 530-kb linear minichromosome 70 times more frequently than wild-type strains, and that homozygous
bub1
diploids are extremely genetically unstable. Thus,
our fission yeast results strongly support the idea of a
causal relationship between the lack of a functional bub1+
gene, the loss of the spindle checkpoint, and the appearance of chromosome instability and aneuploidy in human
cancers.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to J.P. Javerzat, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, CNRS UPR 9026, 1 rue Camille Saint Saëns, 33077 Bordeaux, Cedex, France. Tel.: (33) 556 99 90 26. Fax: (33) 556 99 90 67. E-mail: jpaul.javerzat{at}ibgc.u-bordeaux2.fr
Received for publication 16 September 1998 and in revised form 12 November 1998.
We thank R. Allshire, A. Pidoux (Medical Research Council, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK), and J. Bégueret (Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Bordeaux, France) for advice and helpful discussion, K. Gull (School of Biological Sciences, Manchester, UK) for the gift of TAT1 antibody, A. Carr (Medical Research Council, Brighton, UK) for providing the S. pombe genomic library, A. Murray (University of California, San Francisco, CA) in whose lab the cloning of bub1 was initiated, and S. MacNeill (Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK) for help with the elutriation.
This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and the Wellcome Trust. P. Bernard was supported by a fellowship from the Ministère de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement Supérieur.
| |
Abbreviations used in this paper |
|---|
APC, anaphase-promoting complex; BUB, budding uninhibited by benzimidazole; CIN, chromosomal instability phenotype; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; HA, hemagglutinin; MAD, mitotic arrest-deficient; mHA, anti-HA mouse monoclonal antibody; ORF, open reading frame; rHA, anti-HA rabbit polyclonal serum; ssl, swi6 synthetic lethal.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|