JCB logo
MBoC5 from Garland Science
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gumbiner, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gumbiner, B. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2000/2/399/ $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 148, Number 3, February 7, 2000 399-404

Mini-Review

Regulation of Cadherin Adhesive Activity

Barry M. Gumbinera
a Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021

Correspondence to: Barry M. Gumbiner, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Box 564, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021. E-mail:b-gumbiner{at}ski.mskcc.org.

Adhesive interactions between cells are dynamic and regulated during tissue development and homeostasis. Cadherins are major cell–cell adhesion molecules involved in the development and maintenance of all solid tissues (Takeichi 1991 Down; Gumbiner 1996 Down). Therefore, regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion and the associated adherens junctions is thought to underlie the dynamics of the adhesive interactions between cells. A major form of regulation occurs at the level of cadherin gene expression. The level of cadherin expression influences the strength of adhesion (Steinberg and Takeichi 1994 Down), and the type of cadherin expressed determines the specificity of cell interactions (Nose et al. 1988 Down) and properties of the interactions. However, there is accumulating evidence that posttranscriptional regulation of cadherin adhesive activity is responsible for many of the dynamic, rapid changes in cell interactions that underlie tissue morphogenesis and homeostasis. The mechanisms underlying the regulation of cadherin adhesive activity is the topic of this Mini-Review.


right arrow   Types of Cadherin Regulation
up arrowTop
 dotTypes of Cadherin Regulation
down arrowMechanisms of Cadherin...
 down arrowAcknowledgements
 down arrowReferences

Several different mechanisms have been proposed for cadherin regulation. However, before discussing these in detail, it is worth first considering what exactly is meant by cadherin regulation. Many different cellular processes can affect cell adhesion and the state of adherens junctions, which are formed by the cadherins. During certain morphogenetic processes, for example, the strength of cell adhesion is modulated rapidly in response to growth factors or other signals without gross changes in the presence of adhesive complexes or junctions at cell contacts (Fig 1, top). This direct response to cellular signals is analogous to the rapid regulation of integrin function, called inside-out signaling, which occurs in leukocytes and platelets (Ginsberg et al. 1992 Down). On the other hand, dramatic changes in the assembly or disassembly of adherens junctions also seem to occur, usually in association with major changes in cell state or differentiation, such as the epithelial–mesenchymal or mesenchymal–epithelial transitions (Fig 1, middle). Such transitions involve major changes in cell differentiation, and are likely to affect the state of assembly of cell contacts and adherens junctions directly and indirectly in complex ways. In addition, the normal assembly and turnover of cadherin-based junctions in cells under steady-state conditions is likely to be under regulatory control (Fig 1, bottom). The biogenesis of junctions from newly synthesized components and their coordinated turnover are complex multistep processes that, like formation of all subcellular organelles and compartments, are subject to cellular control mechanisms (Adams et al. 1996 Down; Le et al. 1999 Down). The 5–10-h half-life for E-cadherin in confluent epithelial cells (McCrea and Gumbiner 1991 Down; Shore and Nelson 1991 Down) make cell contacts or junctions susceptible to rapid alteration or remodeling by a number of mechanisms, including changes in gene expression. Clearly, these different cellular processes affect cell adhesion and adherens junctions at different levels and, therefore, could be regulated by different mechanisms. In tumor cells, in which cadherins are often found to be dysfunctional, any of the above regulatory processes could be perturbed.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Types of regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion. Regulation can occur at different levels: rapid cell-surface regulation of adhesion (top); adherens junction formation associated with major changes in cell states, such as the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (middle); or control of the biogenesis or turnover of cell junctions (bottom).

Cadherin regulation has been examined in numerous model systems. Regulation of cadherin activity in real tissues or organisms has been well documented in a few cases. Compaction of the early mouse embryo, leading to the formation of the trophectodermal epithelium, is a striking example (Fleming and Johnson 1988 Down). It results from the rapid activation of E-cadherin–mediated adhesion in response to a cellular signal (Vestweber et al. 1987 Down). In this case, preexisting E-cadherin at the cell surface is recruited to regions of cell contact concomitant with activation of adhesion. A more subtle form of cadherin regulation at the cell surface occurs during tissue elongation in the Xenopus embryo, which contributes to the morphogenetic movements of gastrulation. This form of tissue morphogenesis, called convergent extension, results from local cell rearrangements, which requires that cells continually break and remake adhesive contacts (Gerhart and Keller 1986 Down). When Xenopus animal cap explants are stimulated to undergo convergent extension–driven elongation by treatment with the mesoderm inducing factor activin, the adhesive activity of the major cadherin, C-cadherin (or EP-cadherin), at the cell surface is significantly reduced (Brieher and Gumbiner 1994 Down). Restoration of high adhesive activity with a C-cadherin activating mAb inhibits tissue elongation, demonstrating that regulation is required for normal morphogenesis (Zhong et al. 1999 Down).

Cell culture systems also have been used to study cadherin regulation. Culture models with the most obvious relevance to regulation in vivo are the responses of epithelial cell lines to growth factors. EGF and scatter factor/HGF induce decreased cell–cell contact without apparent loss or disruption of the E-cadherin–catenin complex (Weidner et al. 1990 Down; Shibamoto et al. 1994 Down). In simple cultures, these growth factors cause cells to completely dissociate or scatter from each other, but their physiological roles may be more pertinent to cell rearrangements and tissue morphogenesis. In three-dimensional matrix-embedded cultures, epithelial cells undergo tubulogenesis in response to the scatter factor/HGF (Montesano et al. 1991 Down). Similar morphogenetic behaviors are observed for endothelial cells in response to their growth factors. Cell culture models also have been used to try to examine the effects of pharmacological inhibitors or expression of wild-type or mutant signal transduction proteins on adhesion or cell junctions. Such models can yield valuable information about potential signaling pathways relevant to the expression and/or functions of cadherins or cell junctions, but in many cases their physiological roles remain to be assessed.


right arrow   Mechanisms of Cadherin Regulation
up arrowTop
 up arrowTypes of Cadherin Regulation
 dotMechanisms of Cadherin...
down arrowAcknowledgements
 down arrowReferences

Cadherins form tight complexes with catenins, which are believed to link the cadherins functionally to the actin cytoskeleton (Fig 2 A) (Kemler 1993 Down). Because they are required for strong cell–cell adhesion in tissues, the catenins have often been investigated as potential cytoplasmic targets for regulation. Changes in the composition of the complex, phosphorylation of components in the complex, and alterations in the interaction of the complex with the actin cytoskeleton have all been suggested to play a role in regulation of adhesion.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. The cadherin–catenin complex and its interaction with other proteins. (A) The core cadherin–catenin complex. {Delta}-Catenin seems to be similar to p120ctn (Lu et al. 1999 Down). (B) Protein interactions that mediate the association of {alpha}-catenin with the actin cytoskeleton. (C) Signaling proteins known to be associated with the cadherin–catenin complex.

Changes in the composition of the cadherin–catenin complex have been proposed to play a role in some cases of cadherin regulation. For example, activation of the wnt signaling pathway, which leads to increased levels of ß-catenin (or plakoglobin), has been found to promote the formation of the complex at the plasma membrane and enhance cadherin-mediated adhesion in certain cell lines (Bradley et al. 1993 Down; Hinck et al. 1994 Down). However, in many cell types, the levels of cadherin expression, rather than catenin levels, seem to be rate limiting for complex formation and cell adhesion (Nagafuchi et al. 1991 Down; Kowalczyk et al. 1994 Down; Guger and Gumbiner 1995 Down; Yap et al. 1998 Down). Thus, although the wnt pathway is known to work through modulation of ß-catenin levels, its role in the physiological or developmental regulation of adhesion remains uncertain.

Typically, when cadherin adhesion activity at the cell surface is acutely and rapidly modulated in response to developmental signals or growth factors, analogous to integrin inside-out signaling, no detectable alterations in the composition of the cadherin–catenin complex have been apparent (Weidner et al. 1990 Down; Brieher and Gumbiner 1994 Down; Shibamoto et al. 1994 Down). Nonetheless, disruption of the complex has been observed to occur in a few cases as a result of the perturbation of intracellular signaling pathways; for example, by the expression of activated Cdc42 (see below) or tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors (Ozawa and Kemler 1998a Down). The physiological roles of these perturbations remain to be established; it is not yet known whether they mediate rapid cell-surface regulation of adhesion, control the biogenesis or turnover of cell junctions, or regulate events associated with major changes in cell states, such as the epithelial–mesenchymal transition.

The interaction of {alpha}-catenin with the actin cytoskeleton may also provide an important potential locus for regulation. {alpha}-Catenin interacts with a number of actin-binding proteins, including {alpha}-actinin, vinculin, ZO-1, as well as with actin itself (Fig 2 B; Knudsen et al. 1995 Down; Rimm et al. 1995 Down; Watabe-Uchida et al. 1998 Down; Imamura et al. 1999 Down). The roles of these various interactions in cadherin function are only beginning to be analyzed. Vinculin seems to be important for organizing E-cadherin into a zonular adherens junction typical of epithelial cells, but may not be essential for basic adhesive functions or adhesion in nonepithelial cells (Watabe-Uchida et al. 1998 Down). The ZO-1 binding region of {alpha}-catenin seems to influence the strength of cadherin-mediated adhesion in nonepithelial cells, but ZO-1 binding does not seem to be critical for E-cadherin function or adherens junctions in epithelial cells (Imamura et al. 1999 Down). The cell type–specific functions of these interactions suggests that they are involved in the control of junction assembly rather than the rapid regulation of the basic adhesion mechanism, but much more needs to be learned about the specific functions of these important protein interactions.

Tyrosine phosphorylation of the cadherin–catenin complex also has been implicated in the regulation of adhesion (Daniel and Reynolds 1997 Down). Tyrosine phosphorylation of ß-catenin correlates with inhibition of cadherin-mediated adhesion resulting from kinase activation (Matsuyoshi et al. 1992 Down; Behrens et al. 1993 Down; Shibamoto et al. 1994 Down). Moreover, both receptor tyrosine kinases and receptor tyrosine phosphatases have been found to coimmunoprecipitate with cadherin–catenin complexes (Fig 2 C) (Hoschuetzky et al. 1994 Down; Brady-Kalnay et al. 1995 Down). However, there are very many potential substrates for these kinases and phosphatases in the plasma membrane and cytoskeleton, and it has not yet been shown that ß-catenin phosphorylation is required for the observed effects on cell adhesion. Indeed, an E-cadherin–{alpha}-catenin fusion chimera, which functions without any ß-catenin in the complex, has been found to remain subject to regulation by the v-src tyrosine kinase (Takeda et al. 1995 Down). Whether phosphorylation of other potential substrates associated with the complex (such as p120ctn or still unidentified proteins) participates in the regulation of cadherin activity remains to be determined.

The protein p120ctn, which is structurally related to ß-catenin (armadillo repeat-containing proteins), is also a good candidate for a regulator of cadherin adhesion activity (Fig 2 A). It binds to a region of the cadherin cytoplasmic tail, the juxtamembrane domain, which is distinct from the classical catenin-binding site (Reynolds et al. 1994 Down; Yap et al. 1998 Down; Thoreson et al. 2000 Down). In some cell types, p120ctn seems to act as an inhibitor of cadherin-mediated adhesion, because either the deletion of the cadherin juxtamembrane domain or the expression of a mutant form of p120ctn leads to activation of adhesion (Aono et al. 1999 Down; Ohkubo and Ozawa 1999 Down). In Colo 205 tumor cells, which have an intact but inactive E-cadherin–catenin complex, adhesion can be activated with staurosporine, a serine kinase inhibitor, which also induces an increase in the electrophoretic gel mobility of p120ctn (Aono et al. 1999 Down). The composition of the cadherin complex, including the amount of p120ctn, does not seem to be altered in these greatly different adhesive states. In other cell types, the juxtamembrane domain of the cadherin cytoplasmic tail and p120ctn has been proposed to play a positive role in the control of cadherin-mediated adhesion. Deletion of the distal catenin-binding domain of two cadherins, C-cadherin and VE-cadherin, does not interfere with their basic adhesive functions in CHO cells (Navarro et al. 1995 Down; Yap et al. 1998 Down). Moreover, selective uncoupling of p120ctn from E-cadherin by mutution of the p120ctn binding site disrupts strong adhesion in cultured cells (Thoreson et al. 2000 Down). Thus, the juxtamembrane domain and/or p120ctn could have both positive and negative roles in adhesion. The mechanism by which p120ctn and the juxtamembrane domain influence cadherin function and their relationship to the functions of the distal catenin-binding domain and the catenins is unknown.

The small GTPases, Rac, Rho, and Cdc42, have also been implicated in cadherin-mediated adhesion (Kaibuchi et al. 1999 Down). This subfamily of small GTPases is well known to be involved in regulating actin–membrane interactions (Hall 1998 Down) and, therefore, it is not surprising that they might influence adherens junctions or cadherin-mediated adhesion. Overexpression of constitutively active Rac generally results in greater accumulation of E-cadherin, ß-catenin, and actin at the regions of contact between epithelial cells, whereas dominant negative Rac has the opposite effect (Braga et al. 1997 Down; Takaishi et al. 1997 Down). Similarly, Rac activity is required for actin accumulation at the adherens junction in Drosophila cells (Eaton et al. 1995 Down). Tiam-1, a nucleotide-exchange factor for Rac, has been localized to the adherens junctions of MDCK cells, and overexpression of Tiam-1 or activated Rac increases E-cadherin–mediated adhesion, as measured by cell aggregation assays (Hordijk et al. 1997 Down). In a few cases, Rho and Cdc42 have been found to have similar affects as Rac, but their effects have been less consistent (Braga et al. 1997 Down; Takaishi et al. 1997 Down). The physiological or developmental roles of the small GTPases in the regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion have not been fully elucidated, but overall the findings suggest that they may have roles in assembly or disassembly of adherens junctions (Fig 1, middle or bottom).

These small GTPases could indirectly regulate cadherin-mediated adhesion or junction formation through their well known affects on the actin cytoskeleton. However, recent studies provide evidence that Cdc42 directly affects the cadherin complex (Kuroda et al. 1998 Down; Fukata et al. 1999 Down; Kaibuchi et al. 1999 Down). IQGAP1, an effector of both Cdc42 and Rac, can bind to E-cadherin–ß-catenin complexes and compete for its binding to {alpha}-catenin, resulting in dissociation of {alpha}-catenin from the cadherin complex and rendering the cells nonadhesive. Cdc42 and Rac1 were found to inhibit IQGAP1 binding to ß-catenin and to rescue adhesion, which is consistent with the hypothesis that Cdc42 and Rac1 lead to stabilization of the cadherin–catenin complex. Which physiological role this mechanism might play in cadherin regulation in vivo has not yet been established. Since dissociation of {alpha}-catenin from the cadherin complex has not yet been observed in many cases of rapid physiological regulation of adhesion (inside-out signaling), it is possible that the small GTPases and IQGAP1 regulate the overall state of assembly of adherens junctions. Nonetheless, the findings demonstrate a mechanism by which small GTPases can influence the state of cell contacts at the level of the association of {alpha}-catenin with the cadherin complex.

Genetic experiments have revealed another group of proteins that seem to participate in some way in the cellular organization or formation of epithelial adherens junctions. These include afadin and shroom in mammals (Hildebrand and Soriano 1999 Down; Ikeda et al. 1999 Down), and Discs large, Discs lost, Bazooka, stardust (gene), and Crumbs in Drosophila (all but the last two are known to be PDZ domain-containing proteins) (Grawe et al. 1996 Down; Muller and Wieschaus 1996 Down; Woods et al. 1996 Down; Bhat et al. 1999 Down; Wodarz et al. 1999 Down). Bazooka, Discs lost, and Crumbs are apical or apicolateral localized proteins that are thought to play a role in the establishment of epithelial polarity. Discs large is a septate junction protein, whereas afadin and shroom are localized to adherens junctions. In fact, afadin and an Ig-type adhesion molecule with which it associates, called nectin, are more highly concentrated in the adherens junctions than E-cadherin or the catenins (Takahashi et al. 1999 Down). None of these proteins are thought to interact with cadherins, and it is not known whether they directly regulate cadherin adhesive activity. They may exert their effects either indirectly through cytoskeletal organization/polarization of the epithelial cell or by an alternate function in the adherens junction itself.

Irrespective of the roles of intracellular signaling pathways, cytoplasmic binding proteins, and junctional organizing proteins, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of the homophilic binding function of the cadherin extracellular domain are very poorly understood. For integrin inside-out signaling, both conformational changes in the ligand-binding site and alterations in higher order organization in the membrane, such as clustering, have been implicated (Ginsberg et al. 1992 Down; Gumbiner 1996 Down). So far, there is no evidence for affinity modulation of cadherins, but higher order organization does seem to play a role in regulating C-cadherin in Xenopus embryos (Zhong et al. 1999 Down). The nature of the higher order of cadherins at the site of cell contact and how it is influenced by the actin cytoskeleton is not well understood. Lateral dimerization of cadherins appears to be required for adhesive function, and it has been suggested that dimerization could be subject to regulation (Brieher et al. 1996 Down; Ozawa and Kemler 1998b Down; Tamura et al. 1998 Down). Also, although cadherins are often associated with adherens junctions, they can mediate adhesion independent of their incorporation into junctions. The functional difference between junctional and nonjunctional forms of cadherin-mediated adhesion is not well understood. Ultimately, it will be important to learn how the homophilic adhesive bonds between cadherin molecules at the cell surface are regulated by the cytoplasmic mechanisms to understand how cells make and break adhesive interactions in tissues.


right arrow   Acknowledgements
up arrowTop
 up arrowTypes of Cadherin Regulation
 up arrowMechanisms of Cadherin...
 dotAcknowledgements
down arrowReferences

Thanks to Carien Niessen and Cara Gottardi (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY) for helpful comments on the manuscript.

This project was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant (GM52717) awarded to B.M. Gumbiner and by the Dewitt Wallace Fund for MSKCC.

Submitted: 3 December 1999
Revised: 6 January 2000
Accepted: 6 January 2000


right arrow   References
up arrowTop
 up arrowTypes of Cadherin Regulation
 up arrowMechanisms of Cadherin...
 up arrowAcknowledgements
 dotReferences

  1. Adams, C.L., Nelson, W.J., Smith, S.J. 1996. Quantitative analysis of cadherin-catenin-actin reorganization during development of cell–cell adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 135:1899-1911[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  2. Aono, S., Nakagawa, S., Reynolds, A.B., Takeichi, M. 1999. p120(ctn) acts as an inhibitory regulator of cadherin function in colon carcinoma cells. J. Cell Biol 145:551-562[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  3. Behrens, J., Vakaet, L., Friis, R., Winterhager, E., Roy, F.V., Mareel, M.M., Birchmeier, W. 1993. Loss of epithelial differentiation and gain of invasiveness correlates with tyrosine phosphorylation of the E-cadherin/ß-catenin complex in cells transformed with a temperature-sensitive v-SRC gene. J. Cell Biol. 120:757-766[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  4. Bhat, M.A., Izaddoost, S., Lu, Y., Cho, K.O., Choi, K.W., Bellen, H.J. 1999. Discs Lost, a novel multi-PDZ domain protein, establishes and maintains epithelial polarity. Cell 96:833-845[Medline].

  5. Bradley, R.S., Cowin, P., Brown, A.M.C. 1993. Expression of wnt-1 in PC12 cells results in modulation of plakoglobin and E-cadherin and increased cellular adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 123:1857-1865[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  6. Brady-Kalnay, S.M., Rimm, D.L., Tonks, N.K. 1995. Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPm associated with cadherins and catenins in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 130:977-986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  7. Braga, V.M., Machesky, L.M., Hall, A., Hotchin, N.A. 1997. The small GTPases Rho and Rac are required for the establishment of cadherin-dependent cell–cell contacts. J. Cell Biol 137:1421-1431[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  8. Brieher, W.M., Gumbiner, B.M. 1994. Regulation of C-cadherin function during activin-induced morphogenesis of Xenopus animal caps. J. Cell Biol 126:519-527[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  9. Brieher, W.M., Yap, A.S., Gumbiner, B.M. 1996. Lateral dimerization is required for the homophilic binding activity of C-cadherin. J. Cell Biol 135:487-496[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  10. Daniel, J.M., Reynolds, A.B. 1997. Tyrosine phosphorylation and cadherin/catenin function. Bioessays 19:883-891[Medline].

  11. Eaton, S., Auvinen, P., Luo, L., Jan, Y.N., Simons, K. 1995. CDC42 and Rac1 control different actin-dependent processes in the Drosophila wing Disc epithelium. J. Cell Biol 131:151-164[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  12. Fleming, T.P., Johnson, M.H. 1988. From egg to epithelium. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 4:459-485.

  13. Fukata, M., Kuroda, S., Nakagawa, M., Kawajiri, A., Itoh, N., Shoji, I., Matsuura, Y., Yonehara, S., Fujisawa, H., Kikuchi, A., Kaibuchi, K. 1999. Cdc42 and Rac1 regulate the interaction of IQGAP1 with beta-catenin. J. Biol. Chem 274:26044-26050[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  14. Gerhart, J., Keller, R. 1986. Region-specific cell activities in amphibian gastrulation. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 2:201-229.

  15. Ginsberg, M.H., Du, X., Plow, E.F. 1992. Inside-out integrin signalling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 4:766-771[Medline].

  16. Grawe, F., Wodarz, A., Lee, B., Knust, E., Skaer, H. 1996. The Drosophila genes crumbs and stardust are involved in the biogenesis of adherens junctions. Development 122:951-959[Abstract].

  17. Guger, K.A., Gumbiner, B.M. 1995. ß-Catenin has Wnt-like activity and mimics the Nieuwkoop signaling center in Xenopus dorsal-ventral patterning. Dev. Biol. 172:115-125[Medline].

  18. Gumbiner, B.M. 1996. Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 84:345-357[Medline].

  19. Hall, A. 1998. Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science 279:509-514[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  20. Hildebrand, J.D., Soriano, P. 1999. Shroom, a PDZ domain-containing actin-binding protein, is required for neural tube morphogenesis in mice. Cell 99:485-497[Medline].

  21. Hinck, L., Nelson, W.J., Papkoff, J. 1994. Wnt-1 modulates cell–cell adhesion in mammalian cells by stabilizing ß-catenin binding to the cell adhesion protein cadherin. J. Cell Biol. 124:729-741[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  22. Hordijk, P.L., ten Klooster, J.P., van der Kammen, R.A., Michiels, F., Oomen, L.C., Collard, J.G. 1997. Inhibition of invasion of epithelial cells by Tiam1-Rac signaling. Science 278:1464-1466[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  23. Hoschuetzky, H., Aberle, H., Kemler, R. 1994. ß-Catenin mediates the interaction of the cadherin–catenin complex with epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Cell Biol 127:1375-1380[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  24. Ikeda, W., Nakanishi, H., Miyoshi, J., Mandai, K., Ishizaki, H., Tanaka, M., Togawa, A., Takahashi, K., Nishioka, H. et al. 1999. Afadin: a key molecule essential for structural organization of cell–cell junctions of polarized epithelia during embryogenesis. J. Cell Biol 146:1117-1132[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  25. Imamura, Y., Itoh, M., Maeno, Y., Tsukita, S., Nagafuchi, A. 1999. Functional domains of {alpha}-catenin required for the strong state of cadherin-based cell adhesion. J. Cell Biol 144:1311-1322[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  26. Kaibuchi, K., Kuroda, S., Fukata, M., Nakagawa, M. 1999. Regulation of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion by the Rho family GTPases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 11:591-596[Medline].

  27. Kemler, R. 1993. From cadherins to catenins: cytoplasmic protein interactions and regulation of cell adhesion. Trends Genet 9:317-321[Medline].

  28. Knudsen, K.A., Soler, A.P., Johnson, K.R., Wheelock, M.J. 1995. Interaction of {alpha}-actinin with the cadherin/catenin cell–cell adhesion complex via {alpha}-catenin. J. Cell Biol. 130:67-77[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  29. Kowalczyk, A.P., Palka, H.L., Luu, H.H., Nilles, L.A., Anderson, J.E., Wheelock, M.J., Green, K.J. 1994. Posttranslational regulation of plakoglobin expression. Influence of the desmosomal cadherins on plakoglobin metabolic stability. J. Biol. Chem. 269:31214-31223[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  30. Kuroda, S., Fukata, M., Nakagawa, M., Fujii, K., Nakamura, T., Ohkubo, T., Izawa, I., Nagase, T., Nomura, N., Tani, H. et al. 1998. Role of IQGAP1, a target of the small GTPases Cdc42 and Rac1, in regulation of E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion. Science 281:832-835[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  31. Le, T.-L., Yap, A.S., Stow, J.L. 1999. Recycling of E-cadherin: a potential mechanism for regulating cadherin dynamics. J. Cell Biol. 146:219-232[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  32. Lu, Q., Paredes, M., Medina, M., Zhou, J., Cavallo, R., Peifer, M., Orecchio, L., Kosik, K.S. 1999. {Delta}-Catenin, an adhesive junction–associated protein which promotes cell scattering. J. Cell Biol. 144:519-532[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  33. Matsuyoshi, N., Hamaguchi, M., Taniguchi, S., Nagafuchi, A., Tsukita, S., Takeichi, M. 1992. Cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesion is perturbed by v-src tyrosine phosphorylation in metastatic fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol 118:703-714[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  34. McCrea, P., Gumbiner, B. 1991. Purification of a 92-kDa cytoplasmic protein tightly associated with the cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin (uvomorulin): characterization and extractability of the protein complex from the cell cytostructure. J. Biol. Chem. 266:4514-4520[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  35. Montesano, R., Shaller, G., Orci, L. 1991. Induction of epithelial tubular morphogenesis in vitro by fibroblast-derived soluble factors. Cell 66:697-711[Medline].

  36. Müller, H.-A.J., Wieschaus, E. 1996. armadillo, bazooka, and stardust are critical for early stages in formation of a zonula adherens and maintenance of the polarized blastoderm epithelium in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 134:149-163[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  37. Nagafuchi, A., Takeichi, M., Tsukita, S. 1991. The 102 kd cadherin-associated protein: similarity to vinculin and posttranscriptional regulation of expression. Cell 65:849-857[Medline].

  38. Navarro, P., Caveda, L., Breviario, F., Mandoteanu, I., Lampugnani, M.G., Dejana, E. 1995. Catenin-dependent and -independent functions of vascular endothelial cadherin. J. Biol. Chem 270:30965-30972[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  39. Nose, A., Nagafuchi, A., Takeichi, M. 1988. Expressed recombinant cadherins mediate cell sorting in model systems. Cell 54:993-1001[Medline].

  40. Ohkubo, T., Ozawa, M. 1999. p120(ctn) binds to the membrane-proximal region of the E-cadherin cytoplasmic domain and is involved in modulation of adhesion activity. J. Biol. Chem 274:21409-21415[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  41. Ozawa, M., Kemler, R. 1998a. Altered cell adhesion activity by pervanadate due to the dissociation of alpha-catenin from the E-cadherin/catenin complex. J. Biol. Chem 273:6166-6170[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  42. Ozawa, M., Kemler, R. 1998b. The membrane-proximal region of the E-cadherin cytoplasmic domain prevents dimerization and negatively regulates adhesion activity. J. Cell Biol 142:1605-1613[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  43. Reynolds, A.B., Daniel, J., McCrea, P., Wheelock, M.J., Wu, J., Zhang, Z. 1994. Identification of a new catenin: the tyrosine kinase substrate p120cas associates with E-cadherin complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:8333-8342[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  44. Rimm, D.L., Koslov, E.R., Kebriaei, P., Cianci, C.D., Morrow, J.S. 1995. a1(E)-Catenin is an actin-binding and -bundling protein mediating the attachment of F-actin to the membrane adhesion complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:8813-8817[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  45. Shibamoto, S., Hayakawa, M., Takeuchi, K., Hori, T., Oku, N., Miyazawa, K., Kitamura, N., Takeichi, M., Ito, F. 1994. Tyrosine phosphorylation of beta-catenin and plakoglobin enhanced by hepatocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor in human carcinoma cells. Cell Adhes Commun 1:295-305[Medline].

  46. Shore, E.M., Nelson, W.J. 1991. Biosynthesis of the cell adhesion molecule uvormorulin (E-cadherin) in Madin-Darby canine kidney epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 266:19672-19680[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  47. Steinberg, M.S., Takeichi, M. 1994. Experimental specification of cell sorting, tissue spreading, and specific spatial patterning by quantitative differences in cadherin expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:206-209[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  48. Takahashi, K., Nakanishi, H., Miyahara, M., Mandai, K., Satoh, K., Satoh, A., Nishioka, H., Aoki, J., Nomoto, A., Mizoguchi, A., Takai, Y. 1999. Nectin/PRR: an immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule recruited to cadherin-based adherens junctions through interaction with afadin, a PDZ domain-containing protein. J. Cell Biol. 145:539-549[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  49. Takaishi, K., Sasaki, T., Kotani, H., Nishioka, H., Takai, Y. 1997. Regulation of cell–cell adhesion by rac and rho small G proteins in MDCK cells. J. Cell Biol 139:1047-1059[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  50. Takeda, H., Nagafuchi, A., Yonemura, S., Tsukita, S., Behrens, J., Birchmeier, W. 1995. V-src kinase shifts the cadherin-based cell adhesion from the strong to the weak state and beta catenin is not required for the shift. J. Cell Biol 131:1839-1847[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  51. Takeichi, M. 1991. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science 251:1451-1455[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  52. Tamura, K., Shan, W.S., Hendrickson, W.A., Colman, D.R., Shapiro, L. 1998. Structure-function analysis of cell adhesion by neural (N-) cadherin. Neuron 20:1153-1163[Medline].

  53. Thoreson, M.A., Anastasiads, P.Z., Daniel, J.M., Ireton, R.C., Wheelock, M.J., Johnson, K.R., Hummingbird, D.K., Reynolds, A.B. 2000. Selective uncoupling of p120ctn from E-cadherin disputes strong adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 148:189-201[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  54. Vestweber, D., Gossler, A., Boller, K., Kemler, R. 1987. Expression and distribution of cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin in mouse preimplantation embryos. Dev. Biol. 124:451-456[Medline].

  55. Watabe-Uchida, M., Uchida, N., Imamura, Y., Nagafuchi, A., Fujimoto, K., Uemura, T., Vermeulen, S., van Roy, F., Adamson, E.D., Takeichi, M. 1998. {alpha}-Catenin–vinculin interaction functions to organize the apical junctional complex in epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol 142:847-857[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  56. Weidner, K.M., Behrens, J., Vandekerckhove, J., Birchmeier, W. 1990. Scatter factor: molecular characteristics and effect on the invasiveness of epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 111:2097-2108[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  57. Wodarz, A., Ramrath, A., Kuchinke, U., Knust, E. 1999. Bazooka provides an apical cue for Inscuteable localization in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nature 402:544-547[Medline].

  58. Woods, D.F., Hough, C., Peel, D., Callaini, G., Bryant, P.J. 1996. Dlg protein is required for junction structure, cell polarity, and proliferation control in Drosophila epithelia. J. Cell Biol. 134:1469-1482[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  59. Yap, A.S., Niessen, C.M., Gumbiner, B.M. 1998. The juxtamembrane region of the cadherin cytoplasmic tail supports lateral clustering, adhesive strengthening, and interaction with p120ctn. J. Cell Biol 141:779-789[Abstract/Free Full Text].

  60. Zhong, Y., Brieher, W.M., Gumbiner, B.M. 1999. Analysis of C-cadherin regulation during tissue morphogenesis with an activating antibody. J. Cell Biol 144:351-359[Abstract/Free Full Text].
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles: