JCB logo
CrossRef
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 18 November 2002. doi:10.1083/jcb1594rr3
This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2002/11/539-a $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 159, Number 4, 539-a-539


Research Roundup

Putting a cap on reinitiation


Native and recombinant capping enzymes block transcription in vitro.

Tempst/Elsevier

The transcription apparatus barely gets started before shutting itself down, according to Lawrence Myers (Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH), Paul Tempst (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY), and colleagues.

The authors have found that the two yeast mRNA capping enzymes, Cet1p and Ceg1p, are potent in vitro inhibitors of transcription. Cet1p, stimulated by its Ceg1p binding partner, stalled transcription by blocking reinitiation at already activated promoters. Conversely, elimination of Cet1p in vivo stimulated transcription. Although Cet1p is the first general repressor found to act at reinitiation, this step is well suited for transcription inhibition. "If 100 transcripts are made from a promoter," says Myers, "only one is made at initiation—the remaining 99 are made by reinitiation."

A block by the capping enzyme could ensure that RNA polymerase does not make more transcripts than can be properly processed. It is still unclear how capping enzymes block reinitiation. Possibly, the interaction of Cet1p with proteins in the reinitiation scaffold may prevent further polymerase subunits from entering. The inhibition must be lifted to allow multiple rounds of transcription. Here, Myers speculates that the final step of capping (methylation, which does not occur in the in vitro system) might release repression and allow reinitiation. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Myers, L., et al. 2002. Mol. Cell. 10:883–894.[CrossRef][Medline]



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents