JCB logo
Avanti Polar Lipids
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 24 February 2003. doi:10.1083/jcb1605rr4
This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2003/2/627-a $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 160, Number 5, 627-a-627


Research Roundup

Linking spindle to furrow


Rings of RacGAP50C (red) and PBL (green) link spindle and furrow.

Saint/Elsevier

Once it gets going, cytokinesis is a simple squeeze. The complicated machinery is devoted instead to localizing the cytokinesis furrow. Now, Gregory Somers and Robert Saint (Australian National University, Canberra, Australia) have provided a link from mitotic spindle to contractile furrow that may explain how one positions the other.

The group started with the furrow-localized protein Pebble (PBL), a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and thus activator for Rho1 and actin remodeling. Two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation experiments with PBL turned up RacGAP50C. The worm homologue of RacGAP50C, CYK-4, is essential for cytokinesis completion and binds a kinesin-like protein that bundles microtubules in the central spindle.

Consistent with these interactions, RacGAP50C was found in an inner ring near central spindle microtubules, abutting an outer ring of PBL. How these rings affect each other is unclear. PBL and RacGAP50C, despite being an activating GEF and an inhibitory GTPase-activating protein (GAP), interact synergistically rather than antagonistically. Somers and Saint find that the GAP activity is not directed at Rho1 but is required for cytokinesis. Perhaps the logic behind the activity will be tied up in the need to regulate the timing of PBL activation. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Somers, W.G., and R. Saint. 2003. Dev. Cell. 4:29–39.[CrossRef][Medline]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents