JCB logo
PeproTech: Your source for Cell Biology Research Reagents
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 10 March 2003. doi:10.1083/jcb1606rr5
This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2003/3/805-b $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 160, Number 6, 805-b-805


Research Roundup

Riding Kar9 into the bud


The asymmetry of Kar9 (green) ensures only one set of spindle microtubules enters the bud.

Barral/Elsevier

Alignment of the mitotic spindle with the axis of cell division in budding yeast ensures that one and only one chromatid set is pulled into the bud. Microtubule interactions with the cortex set this arrangement by capturing one spindle pole at the bud site. Now, Kimitris Liakopoulos, Justine Kusch, Yves Barral (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, Switzerland), and colleagues find that polarity is achieved because only one set of microtubules is marked for this interaction with the cortex.

The Swiss group identified a protein that distinguishes microtubules from the two spindle poles. This myosin- interacting protein, Kar9, localized specifically to the spindle pole destined for the bud (daughter-bound pole). Kar9 polarity depended on the cell cycle kinase Cdk1. Kar9 phosphorylation correlated with its decreased interaction with the microtubule- and spindle-pole–binding protein, Bim1, thus probably reducing its association with the mother-bound pole.

Meanwhile, microtubules at the daughter-bound pole were loaded with Kar9 and were guided to the bud in a myosin-dependent manner along the polarized actin network. Loss of Kar9 asymmetry (through inhibition of Cdk1) caused both sets of microtubules to be drawn to the bud, indicating that Kar9 distinguishes microtubules from the two poles. "For a long time, people were thinking microtubules were microtubules," says Barral. "Now, we see they come in different flavors depending on which pole they come from." {blacksquare}

Reference:

Kiakopoulos, K., et al. 2003. Cell. 112:561–574.[CrossRef][Medline]



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents