JCB logo
BD Biosciences Cell Culture Solutions
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 8 December 2003. doi:10.1083/jcb1635iti5
This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2003/12/927 $8.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 163, Number 5, 927-927


In This Issue

Tearing down actin


Where AC proteins (red) bind, the structure of an actin filament (yellow) resembles its depolymerizing end.

Proteins that take apart actin filaments are hardly creative, according to Galkin et al. (page 1057), who show that destabilizing proteins induce structural states that are normally seen at the depolymerizing end of actin.

That end—the so-called pointed end—normally depolymerizes in the cell even as actin monomers are added at the other "barbed" end. This treadmilling is disturbed by ADF/cofilin (AC) proteins, which tear down actin filaments near the leading edge of migrating cells. The authors used electron microscopy and three-dimensional reconstructions to investigate how AC proteins promote instability and dismantle filaments.

AC-bound filaments looked like the pointed ends of naked actin filaments. Both were missing a contact between subdomain (SD) 2 of one actin monomer and SD1 of the monomer just above it in the filament. In contrast, strong SD1–SD2 interactions were found throughout the rest of the naked actin filaments. These contacts must be weakened for actin strands to adopt a tilted conformation that favors destabilization. AC proteins thus induce this naturally unstable state wherever they bind and cause either depolymerization (if subunits fall off the ends) or severing (if a filament segment is broken off). {blacksquare}



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

ADF/cofilin use an intrinsic mode of F-actin instability to disrupt actin filaments
Vitold E. Galkin, Albina Orlova, Margaret S. VanLoock, Alexander Shvetsov, Emil Reisler, and Edward H. Egelman
J. Cell Biol. 2003 163: 1057-1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents