JCB logo
MBL International Tel: 800.200.5459 CLICK HERE
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 3 January 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1681fta3
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 168, Number 1, 12-12
This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

From the Archive

Ribosomes, or the particles of Palade


Ribosomes, or particles of Palade, in rat pancreas.

PALADE

Early electron microscopy (EM) was troubled by, as George Palade put it, "the perennial and arduous question of artifact versus reality." Stains and fixatives could precipitate—Keith Porter referred to this as "the coagulating action of the fixative"—and produce structures that were not present in the original sample.

But when Palade noted a particulate component of the cytoplasm, he confirmed its presence using two different fixatives, and described its particular abundance in embryonic, rapidly proliferating, and glandular cells (Palade, 1955). Thus were born the particles of Palade, later known as ribosomes.

Palade saw that the particles were both on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and free in the cytoplasm. Although the ER was identified in 1945 (Porter et al., 1945), by 1955 the terms ER, ergastoplasm, and basophilic cytoplasm were still used almost interchangeably—the last in reference to the staining of RNA-rich areas with basic dyes. Palade realized that not all of the ER had bound ribosomes, and thus the basophilic region referred only to what we would now term the rough ER.

This distinction between rough and smooth ER was made even more explicit by Palay and Palade (1955), who found that the so-called Nissl bodies in neurons were none other than clumps of rough ER, which were distinct but connected to sections of "a granular reticulum" or smooth ER. As Palade predicted, the correlation between rough ER and protein synthesis came with later correlative studies using both EM and biochemistry. {fta_end}

Palade, G.F. 1955. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 1:59–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Palay, S.L., and G.F. Palade. 1955. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 1:69–88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Porter, K.R., et al. 1945. J. Exp. Med. 81:233–246.[Abstract]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents