JCB logo
MBoC5 from Garland Science
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 7 March 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1686rr1
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 168, Number 6, 850-850
This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Weakness as a strength


A few residues (indicated) tie PINCH-1 and Nck-2 together weakly.

QIN/ELSEVIER

Jun Qin (Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH) is the defender of the weak, or at least of weak protein–protein interactions. His work with Julia Vaynberg, Tomohiko Fukuda, Cary Wu (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA), and colleagues shows that an extremely weak affinity between two focal adhesion proteins is needed for cell migration.

The focal adhesion proteins are the adaptors PINCH-1 and Nck-2, whose weak interaction (KD {approx} 3 mM) was noted previously in yeast two-hybrid assays but not with less sensitive techniques. Using NMR, which unlike crystallography provides structural information even for very weak interactions, the group has now determined the structure of the tiny interface between the adaptors. To prove its biological relevance, they then used genetic rescue experiments to show that the disruption of the PINCH-1/Nck-2 interface in vivo impairs cell spreading and migration.

The results show that the Nck-2/PINCH-1 interaction is necessary for processes that depend on focal adhesions. Focal adhesions, in which many other components are tightly bound, may rely on this weak interaction for dynamic assembly and disassembly.

For Qin, the results extend far beyond this one pair. "In humans," he says, "there are hundreds of thousands of protein–protein interactions. They can't all be strong, or our cells would be glued together all the time." As NMR-based studies on purified proteins is relatively quick and easy, the significance of other very weak interactions (e.g., cell–cell contacts and enzyme–substrate pairs) may be determined soon. {rr_end}

Reference:

Vaynberg, J., et al. 2005. Mol. Cell. 17:513–523.[CrossRef][Medline]



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents