JCB logo
R&D Systems
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 22 August 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1705iti5
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 170, Number 5, 697-697
This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

In This Issue

Sticky interactions


Neisseria gonorrhoeae that bind CEACAMs induce greater cell–cell adhesion (right) and less cell shedding.

Upon infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, human epithelial cells typically float off the underlying extracellular matrix, reducing the bacterial burden for the host. Now, Muenzner et al. (page 825) show that variants of N. gonorrhoeae and other bacterial pathogens that bind to certain cell–cell adhesion molecules can inhibit this shedding, thus increasing the bacteria's ability to colonize their hosts.

The adhesion molecules under study are carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs), which are thought to be involved in microbial infection. CEACAM engagement by the bacteria triggered expression of CD105, a TGFß-like receptor that helps organize focal adhesions. In turn, CD105 expression increased host cell adhesion by activating integrins.No physical association was detected between CEACAMs and CD105 or between CD105 and integrins, so the molecular mechanisms of the pathway are unclear. However, it is apparent that CEACAMs induce CD105 transcription without direct cytoplasmic signaling. CEACAM-6 naturally lacks a cytoplasmic domain and can trigger the response, as can a CEACAM-1 mutant lacking its cytoplasmic tail.

N. gonorrhoeae isolated from patient samples often contain a disproportionate fraction of bacteria that bind CEACAMs, even in controlled experiments where the infection started with bacterial cells that did not bind CEACAMs. The next question is whether bacteria that are beneficial to humans hosts also use CEACAMs. If not, blocking the reaction may be a viable antibacterial strategy. {iti_end}



Rabiya S. Tuma

rabiya{at}nasw.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

CEACAM engagement by human pathogens enhances cell adhesion and counteracts bacteria-induced detachment of epithelial cells
Petra Muenzner, Manfred Rohde, Susanne Kneitz, and Christof R. Hauck
J. Cell Biol. 2005 170: 825-836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents