Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article PDF (Full Text) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wells, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wells, W. A. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Pressure not to misfold means that higher translation correlates with slower evolution. DRUMMOND/NAS

Rates of protein evolution vary widely. Very little of this variation is explained by dispensability (essential proteins evolving slowly), but up to a third is explained by expression levels. For an entirely mysterious reason, highly expressed proteins evolve slowly.Now, Allan Drummond and colleagues (Caltech, Pasadena, CA; and Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, CA) argue that this correlation is based on the severe selective pressure on highly expressed proteins to avoid misfolding even when they are mistranslated. More abundant proteins are a greater misfolding threat because even a low misfolding rate would result in many misfolded, potentially toxic proteins—what Drummond calls "glue-covered monkey wrenches." Genes encoding abundant proteins therefore get stuck, say the authors, in the few sequences that are "translationally robust": they usually fold correctly even when there are translational errors.

The study started not with experiments but theory. "The ‘aha!’ moment was lying in bed," says Drummond. For the theory to work, however, the threat of errors would have to be large enough. Drummond checked his references for translation error rates. "They were absurdly high," he says.

Ribosomes make 5 errors per 10,000 codons translated. "When you convert that into how many proteins are translated," says Drummond, "it becomes much more interesting to look at the cost." With this error rate, 19% of average-length yeast proteins should have a missense error; conservatively, 5% of the proteins might misfold. For the abundant PMA1 transporter that raises the scary prospect of 63,000 misfolded molecules per cell.

The team found that misfolding matters not because it takes proteins out of circulation, but because it creates a potentially damaging molecule. What mattered most for evolution rate was not absolute abundance (the more abundant, the more activity that can potentially be lost by misfolding) but translation frequency (the more translation events, the more opportunities for creating troublesome and long-lived misfolded proteins).

The theory also makes sense of proteins such as the plant enzyme Rubisco, perhaps the most abundant protein on Earth. It is highly conserved but the result of this slow evolution is not functional fragility but, the authors hypothesize, translational robustness—surprisingly few inactivating mutations have been found in its gene.

Reference:

Drummond, D.A., et al. 2005. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.0504070102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This Article PDF (Full Text) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wells, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wells, W. A. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?