JCB logo
R&D Systems
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 21 February 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1725rr5
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 172, Number 5, 641-641
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Trip to the pore


Figure 1
Promoters (green) grab onto nuclear pores (red) only when activated (bottom).

LAEMMLI/ELSEVIER

Aquick visit to the nuclear pore is not an oddity but occurs for most if not all regulated genes, say Manfred Schmid, Ulrich Laemmli, and colleagues (University of Geneva, Switzerland). At least in yeast, the visit may be needed to boost activation of transcription.

The Geneva group had earlier found factors linking transcription activation to the nuclear pore. They now use a nuclease fused to a nuclear pore protein, which clips any DNA that comes to the nuclear pore for a visit.

The regions preferentially cleaved by the nuclease were just upstream of ~40% of genes on chromosome VI. Constitutively expressed genes use different promoter elements and may not need the activation conferred by the visit. But back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that there are enough pores for all activated genes to get in a quick visit, even if they do so for every round of transcription.

Laemmli suggests that "the pore is an active participant in forming a complex between enhancer and promoter." Constrained enhancers could no longer influence more distant promoters.

In higher eukaryotes, Laemmli thinks that so-called transcription factories may act as promoter attachment and assembly sites, and thus as the intranuclear equivalent of nuclear pores. In yeast, the Geneva group is mutating a newly isolated gene that should confirm whether the visit to the pore is an essential event.Formula

Reference:

Schmid, M., et al. 2006. Mol. Cell. 21:379–391.[CrossRef][Medline]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents