JCB logo
Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 17 July 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1742iti4
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 174, Number 2, 165-165
This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

In This Issue

Funky FAK proliferation

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) transduces adhesion forces into pro-proliferation signals in a variety of cell types. Now, Pirone et al. (page 277) show that FAK also inhibits proliferation when cells lack adequate attachments. The two-sided modulation of proliferation by FAK suggests that adhesion is not a simple on–off switch. Rather, the cell monitors and modulates adhesion in a more graded fashion.

Current dogma suggests that more adhesion leads to more FAK activation and thus proliferation, and that loss of FAK activity would prevent proliferation. But Pirone et al. found that cells lacking FAK or expressing a dominant-negative form of the protein (FRNK) proliferated constitutively, whether they were cultured in high or low adhesive conditions.

Further analysis showed that FAK-null cells or those expressing FRNK had higher levels of RhoA expression than control cells. The increased RhoA led to more cytoskeletal tension and the formation of additional focal adhesions. Wild-type FAK thus seems able not only to sense adhesive forces, but also to limit their generation somehow.

A kinase-dead mutant restored normal proliferation responses to adhesion in FAK-null cells. Thus, unlike its proliferation-inducing function, FAK's ability to inhibit cell division does not require its kinase activity. Formula



Rabiya S. Tuma

rabiya{at}nasw.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

An inhibitory role for FAK in regulating proliferation: a link between limited adhesion and RhoA-ROCK signaling
Dana M. Pirone, Wendy F. Liu, Sami Alom Ruiz, Lin Gao, Srivatsan Raghavan, Christopher A. Lemmon, Lewis H. Romer, and Christopher S. Chen
J. Cell Biol. 2006 174: 277-288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents