Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF, 860K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wells, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wells, W. A. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Polymerizing (left) and depolymerizing (right) microtubules are found in different mixtures at kinetochores (bottom). MCEWEN/ELSEVIER

The action of a single kinetochore fiber appears unified—it is either pulling or pushing its attached chromosome at any given time. But underlying this unity is diversity, say Kristin VandenBeldt, Bruce McEwen (Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY), and colleagues. They find that the kinetochore microtubules (kMTs) in a single fiber are a mixture of depolymerizing and polymerizing microtubules.

The concept of unified kinetochore action came from light microscopy. But when the New York team used electron microscopy they saw that the 10–30 kMTs in one fiber had a mixture of morphologies. The kMTs with straight ends at the kinetochore are believed to be polymerizing, whereas those with curved ends are the unravelling depolymerizing kMTs. Surprisingly, two-thirds of kMTs were in the depolymerizing state during metaphase, suggesting that the kinetochore restrains kMTs that are in the depolymerizing state and retards their shrinkage. This restraint should produce the tension that is central to spindle dynamics.

Some kinetochores had fewer depolymerizing kMTs and some had more, but the differences were on a continuum. Thus the kinetochore appears to change direction based on a balance of pulling and pushing forces rather than a discrete, all-or-none switch. How the polymerization bias and kMT detachment are controlled remains largely mysterious.

Reference:

VandenBeldt, K.J., et al. 2006. Curr. Biol. 16:1217–1223.[CrossRef][Medline]

William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This Article Full Text (PDF, 860K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wells, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wells, W. A. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?