|
||
Article |
Correspondence to Panos Z. Anasatasiadis: panos{at}mayo.edu
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanism by which E-cadherin suppresses invasiveness is still unclear. The intracellular domain of E-cadherin interacts directly with ß-catenin and p120 catenin (p120) via separate conserved interaction domains. ß-Catenin binding was recently shown to be important for the anti-invasive properties of E-cadherin (Wong and Gumbiner, 2003), although neither increased cell adhesion nor reduced nuclear ß-catenin signaling was required for this effect. Unlike ß-catenin, p120 has not been implicated in E-cadherinmediated suppression of invasiveness, although it mislocalizes to the cytoplasm of E-cadherindeficient cells. This altered localization of p120 in breast or colon carcinomas is prognostic for aggressive disease (Sarrio et al., 2004; Bellovin et al., 2005).
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is a process associated with normal development and wound healing, but its aberrant regulation contributes to cancer progression and metastasis (Thiery, 2002). Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is associated with loss of E-cadherin expression and increased expression of mesenchymal cadherins. Indeed, overexpression studies have suggested that increased expression of mesenchymal cadherins (N-cadherin, R-cadherin, and cadherin 11) increases the motility and invasiveness of epithelial cells (Nieman et al., 1999; Hazan et al., 2000; Feltes et al., 2002; Suyama et al., 2002). It is currently unclear whether endogenous mesenchymal cadherins are required for the increased motility/invasiveness of E-cadherindeficient cells.
The Rho family of GTPases (e.g., RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42) mediate cytoskeletal dynamics (Nobes and Hall, 1995) and are crucial regulators of both cell motility (Titus et al., 2005) and cadherin-dependent cell adhesion (Braga, 2002). As such, Rho GTPases are thought either to promote intercellular adhesion or to induce cell migration, depending on signals received from the microenvironment. Signaling from the cadherin complexes to Rho GTPases is thought to depend on p120 (Anastasiadis and Reynolds, 2001).
Recent data indicate that p120 binding promotes the stabilization of cadherin complexes on the plasma membrane and thus strengthens cellcell adhesion (Davis et al., 2003; Xiao et al., 2003). In some cases, p120 can also negatively affect cell adhesion, although the mechanism of this effect remains unclear. p120 overexpression induces dramatic changes in cell morphology and increases cell motility (for review see Anastasiadis and Reynolds, 2001). These effects are apparently mediated by the ability of p120 to suppress RhoA activity (Anastasiadis et al., 2000; Noren et al., 2000) and induce the activities of the related Rho GTPases Rac1 and Cdc42 (Noren et al., 2000; Grosheva et al., 2001). E-cadherin overexpression blocks the effects of p120 on cell morphology, suggesting that the recruitment of p120 to E-cadherin complexes reduces its effects toward Rho GTPases and possibly affects the balance between sessile and motile states.
Using E-cadherindeficient cells, we show that endogenous p120 mediates both the invasion-promoting effects of mesenchymal cadherins and the invasion-suppressing action of ectopically expressed E-cadherin. Endogenously expressed mesenchymal cadherins are essential for the invasiveness of E-cadherindeficient cells, and their levels depend on p120 association. Furthermore, p120-induced Rac activation requires binding of p120 to mesenchymal cadherins and promotes invasiveness. p120 also promotes invasiveness by inhibiting RhoA in a cadherin-independent manner. The data indicate that endogenous p120 is an important contributor to both the invasive phenotype of E-cadherindeficient carcinomas and the sessile phenotype of E-cadherinexpressing epithelial cells.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Finally, we examined the invasiveness of p120KD cells expressing murine p120 or a p120 mutant that lacks the first Armadillo domain (A1) and is unable to associate with E-cadherin (Ireton et al., 2002). As shown in Fig. 2 C, expression of full-length p120 reversed the p120KD effect and increased cell invasiveness. In contrast, ectopic expression of the p120 A1 mutant (mp120-A1) failed to rescue invasiveness. The data indicate that the effects of p120 depletion on cell invasion and motility are indeed p120 dependent. They also suggest that cadherin binding is required for the effects of p120 on invasion.
Endogenous mesenchymal cadherins promote the invasiveness of E-cadherindeficient epithelial cells
The inability of a cadherin-uncoupled p120 mutant to promote invasiveness suggested the possibility that in these E-cadherindeficient cells, p120 induces invasiveness via its association with mesenchymal cadherins. MDA-231 cells lack E-cadherin expression but express mesenchymal cadherin 11, whereas UMRC3 cells lack E-cadherin expression but express mesenchymal N-cadherin (unpublished data). Both of these cadherins have been shown to promote motility and invasiveness when overexpressed in tumor cells (Nieman et al., 1999; Hazan et al., 2000). To test the possibility that endogenous p120 acts via mesenchymal cadherins to promote invasiveness, we initially expressed a short myc-tagged fragment of the E-cadherin cytoplasmic tail in MDA-231 cells. This small E-cadherin fragment (
CB) binds avidly to p120, but not ß-catenin, and recruits it to the cytosol away from any endogenous cadherins (Anastasiadis et al., 2000). As can be seen in Fig. 3 A, expression of
CB significantly reduced MDA-231 cell invasiveness.
Furthermore,
CB expression caused a marked reduction in endogenous cadherin 11 levels, consistent with the hypothesis that p120 binding regulates the levels of endogenous cadherins (Ireton et al., 2002; Davis et al., 2003; Xiao et al., 2003). To directly test whether endogenous p120 regulates the levels of mesenchymal cadherins in E-cadherindeficient cells, we determined the expression of mesenchymal cadherins after p120 depletion. Fig. 3 B shows that depletion of endogenous p120 reduced mesenchymal cadherin expression in both MDA-231 and UMRC3 cells.
|
p120 association promotes endogenous mesenchymal cadherin expression and invasiveness
The data in Fig. 3 suggested that one way by which p120 promotes invasiveness is by binding to and regulating the levels of mesenchymal cadherins. Consistent with this hypothesis, the E-cadherinuncoupled p120 A1 mutant was unable to promote invasiveness when expressed in p120KD cells (Fig. 2 C). However, it is not known whether this p120 mutant (p120-A1) is also unable to associate with mesenchymal cadherins and whether its expression affects mesenchymal cadherin levels. To answer the first question, we performed coimmunoprecipitation assays using full-length p120 as a control. As shown in Fig. 4 A, ectopically expressed murine p120 coprecipitated with endogenous cadherin 11 from MDA-231 cells, whereas the p120-A1 mutant did not.
Similar results were also obtained for N-cadherin (unpublished data), indicating that the p120-A1 mutant is uncoupled from both epithelial and mesenchymal cadherins.
|
We next tested the ability of a p120-uncoupled N-cadherin mutant to promote invasiveness. Fig. 4 C shows that ectopic expression of murine N-cadherin in UMRC3 cells depleted of endogenous N-cadherin rescued cell invasiveness. However, expression of a p120-uncoupled N-cadherin mutant (N-cad-AAA; Chen et al., 2003) failed to promote invasiveness. The data argue that p120 promotes motility and invasiveness by binding to mesenchymal cadherins. The association promotes cadherin stability and possibly signaling events that induce cell migration.
p120-mediated Rac activation requires mesenchymal cadherin binding
Having established that p120 and mesenchymal cadherins are required for cell motility and invasiveness, we next examined possible mechanisms for this action. Given the ability of p120 to affect the activity of Rho-family GTPases, we first asked whether p120 and mesenchymal cadherins cooperatively regulate the activity of Rho GTPases in E-cadherindeficient cells.
Initially, we examined the activity of Rac1 in control cells (pRS-neo), p120-depleted cells (p120KD-neo), and cells reexpressing p120 (p120KD-mp120), under basal, serum-starved conditions. As shown in Fig. 5 A, under basal conditions, p120 depletion resulted in significant reduction of Rac1 activity, which was reversed by expression of murine p120. p120 depletion also affected Rac1 activity of HGF-treated cells. Fig. 5 B shows that Rac1 activity was increased in control pRS-neo cells treated with HGF but not in p120-depleted cells (p120KD-neo). Expression of murine p120 in p120-depleted cells (p120KD-mp120) restored HGF-mediated Rac1 activation. In contrast, expression of the cadherin-uncoupled p120-A1 mutant failed to restore Rac1 activation, suggesting that p120-mediated activation of Rac1 requires mesenchymal cadherin binding.
|
The p120-mediated inhibition of RhoA in E-cadherindeficient cells is independent of mesenchymal cadherin expression
Previous studies have shown that p120 overexpression decreases RhoA activity (Anastasiadis et al., 2000; Noren et al., 2000; Grosheva et al., 2001). Thus, we examined the effect of p120 on RhoA activity under either basal (serum-starved) conditions or after HGF treatment. Fig. 6 A shows that under basal conditions, RhoA activity was significantly increased in p120-depleted cells (p120KD-neo) when compared with control cells (pRS-neo).
Consistent with the increased RhoA activity, p120-depleted cells were flatter and contained more stress fibers than control cells (unpublished data). Expression of murine p120 reduced basal RhoA activity levels and restored normal cell morphology, indicating that p120 regulates RhoA activity. Similar results were obtained when cells were treated for 20 min with HGF; control cells and p120-reexpressing cells exhibited reduced Rho activity compared with p120-depleted cells (Fig. 6 B).
|
Rho GTPases regulate the invasiveness of E-cadherindeficient tumor cells
We next sought to establish that the p120-mediated changes in Rho GTPase activities were related to the increased cell migration and invasiveness of E-cadherindeficient cells. First, we overexpressed constitutively active or dominant-negative Rac1 in MDA-231 cells and measured the in vitro invasiveness of serum-starved cells toward a gradient of HGF. Expression of dominant-negative Rac1 (DN-Rac1) significantly reduced cell invasiveness (Fig. 7 A), suggesting that Rac1 activation is required for HGF-induced invasiveness.
Ectopic expression of constitutively active Rac1 did not increase cell invasiveness over cells expressing a vehicle control (pcDNA), suggesting that parental MDA-231 cells maximally activate Rac1 in response to HGF (unpublished data). To test the potential involvement of Rho activation in the invasiveness of MDA-231 cells, we expressed constitutively active RhoA and measured cell invasiveness in response to HGF. As shown in Fig. 7 A, increased levels of active RhoA significantly reduced the invasiveness of MDA-231 cells.
|
The suppression of cell migration and invasiveness by E-cadherin requires p120 binding and reduced expression of mesenchymal cadherins
Having established that endogenous p120 promotes the invasive behavior of E-cadherindeficient cells, we tested the hypothesis that recruitment of p120 to E-cadherin can suppress invasiveness. Ectopic expression of wt human E-cadherin in MDA-231 or UMRC3 cells was accomplished by retroviral infection, followed by G418 selection. More than 95% of infected cells expressed E-cadherin under these conditions. As shown in Fig. 8 A, MDA-231 cells infected with a control neo virus express no E-cadherin, have primarily cytoplasmic p120 staining, and exhibit scattered cell morphology.
In contrast, cells expressing wt E-cadherin form epithelial colonies in which p120 is recruited to the E-cadherinmediated cellcell junctions. Identical results were also obtained with UMRC3 cells. The ectopic expression of E-cadherin significantly inhibited cell migration (Fig. 8 B) and blocked the ability of either MDA-231 or UMRC3 cells to invade in vitro (Fig. 8 C). Together, these experiments establish that both cell lines represent excellent model systems for studying the mechanism by which E-cadherin suppresses invasiveness and the possible involvement of p120.
|
To directly implicate endogenous p120 in E-cadherinmediated suppression of invasiveness, we used two complimentary approaches. In the first, we overexpressed p120 in E-cadherinexpressing cells. In the second, we inhibited p120 function in cells expressing the p120-uncoupled E-cadherin mutant. Fig. 9 A shows that p120 overexpression increased the invasiveness of wt E-cadherinexpressing cells in vitro, suggesting that recruitment of endogenous p120 by E-cadherin suppresses invasion.
Furthermore, the invasiveness of cells expressing the 764-AAA E-cadherin mutant was potently blocked by coexpression of
CB, the small cytoplasmic fragment of E-cadherin that binds selectively to p120 but not ß-catenin. The data suggest that the increased invasiveness of cells expressing p120-uncoupled E-cadherin is due to its inability to recruit endogenous p120 to the E-cadherin complex. To confirm this hypothesis, we examined the effect of p120 depletion on the invasiveness of cells expressing the p120-uncoupled E-cadherin mutant. Retroviral expression of p120-specific shRNA, but not control shRNA, significantly reduced the invasiveness of these cells (Fig. 9 B). Examination of individual p120 shRNA clonal lines with varied endogenous p120 expression indicated that cell invasion is directly correlated with endogenous p120 levels (Fig. 9 B). Collectively, the data indicate that p120 binding is required for E-cadherinmediated suppression of invasiveness.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data demonstrate that mesenchymal cadherins are essential for the migration and invasiveness of E-cadherindeficient tumor cells and that both the physical and the functional interaction with p120 are required for the proinvasive function of mesenchymal cadherins. The data are also consistent with a recent study suggesting that the p120-binding juxtamembrane domain of cadherin 11 is responsible for cadherin 11mediated cell motility (Kiener et al., 2006).
It has been proposed that p120 mediates its effects on cell migration through regulation of Rho GTPases (for review see Anastasiadis and Reynolds, 2001). Interestingly, we show that both the basal and HGF-induced Rac1 activities are inhibited by p120 depletion. Furthermore, experiments using cadherin 11depleted cells or cadherin-uncoupled p120 mutants indicate that the p120-induced Rac1 activation requires mesenchymal cadherin association and are in agreement with recent data suggesting that the p120-binding juxtamembrane domain is required for E-cadherin or N-cadherininduced Rac1 activation upon cellcell adhesion (Goodwin et al., 2003; Gavard et al., 2004).
p120 depletion increased RhoA activity and decreased the activity of Rac1, providing a potential mechanistic explanation for the ability of dominant-active Rac mutants and dominant-negative RhoA mutants to rescue the defects induced by p120 depletion on Xenopus laevis gastrulation (Fang et al., 2004). However, unlike Rac activation, the data suggest that p120 inhibits RhoA in a cadherin-independent manner in these cells, in agreement with several previous investigations (Anastasiadis et al., 2000; Noren et al., 2000; Magie et al., 2002; Bellovin et al., 2005; Perez-Moreno et al., 2006).
To address the involvement of Rho GTPases in the invasiveness of our E-cadherindeficient cells, we initially demonstrated that either reduced Rac1 or increased RhoA activities result in decreased cell invasiveness in vitro. Reduced Rac1 and increased RhoA activities mimic the effects of p120 depletion in these cells. Interestingly, activation of Rac1 and inhibition of RhoA signaling cooperatively restored the invasiveness of p120-depleted cells, arguing that changes in Rho GTPase signaling are causally involved in p120-mediated effects on cell motility and invasiveness.
The observation that endogenous p120 promotes the expression of mesenchymal cadherins and increases the invasiveness of E-cadherindeficient cells suggested the possibility that p120 is also involved in the invasion-suppressive function of E-cadherin. In the simplest scenario, E-cadherin association would reduce the amount of p120 available to bind mesenchymal cadherins and promote invasiveness. Indeed, we show that E-cadherin suppresses invasion, at least in part, by binding endogenous p120. Furthermore, as predicted, mesenchymal cadherin levels were significantly reduced upon the expression of wt E-cadherin but not the p120-uncoupled E-cadherin mutant (764-AAA). The data reveal an important role for p120 binding in E-cadherinmediated suppression of invasiveness and regulation of the motile or sessile phenotype of epithelial cells. It should be noted that the invasiveness of 764-AAA E-cadherinexpressing cells was lower than that of neo controls (Fig. 8 D), suggesting that a portion of the invasion-suppressive function of E-cadherin may not be related to p120 binding. It is likely that other factors, including recruitment of ß-catenin (Wong and Gumbiner, 2003), play important roles in this process.
Our data indicate that p120 binds to and cooperates with mesenchymal cadherins to activate Rac1 and promote motility and invasiveness. However, it is unclear why E-cadherin suppresses migration, despite its ability to activate Rac1 in a p120-dependent manner after its homophilic interaction. One possibility is that the activation of Rac1 in the context of cadherin ligation is effectively different from activation of Rac1 in response to certain growth factors. In agreement with this, lamellipodium extension in response to cadherin activation is reportedly dependent on a PI-3-kinaseRac1 pathway, whereas cadherin-mediated adhesion proceeds via a PI-3-kinase independent, Rac1-dependent pathway; both responses require the membrane association of p120 with the cadherin complex (Gavard et al., 2004). In addition, E-cadherin may be less effective than mesenchymal cadherins in promoting Rac1 activation in response to promigratory signals, or it may be more capable of suppressing growth factor signaling by sequestering and preventing the ligand-dependent activation of their receptors (Qian et al., 2004). Another possibility is that the differential ability of cadherins to recruit p120 to cell junctions may result in differential regulation of Rho activities. In support of these possibilities, the increased migration of R-cadherin overexpressing BT-20 cells, which normally express E-cadherin, correlates with increased Rac1 and reduced RhoA activities (Johnson et al., 2004), suggesting that E-cadherin and mesenchymal cadherins differentially affect Rho GTPases.
Finally, it is important to note that collagen-mediated integrin signaling can switch the effect of increased Rac1 activation from promoting E-cadherinmediated adhesion to promoting cell migration (Sander et al., 1998). The data indicate that contextual signals can misdirect Rac signaling to promote cell migration, even in the presence of E-cadherin. Clearly, understanding the functional differences between E-cadherin and mesenchymal cadherins in regulating cell adhesion versus migration will be critical for understanding tumor progression to metastasis and events involved in tissue morphogenesis.
The data presented here imply that E-cadherin competes p120 away from mesenchymal cadherins, which then become destabilized. Further studies will be needed to address the relative affinities of p120 for different cadherins and how these affinities are affected by posttranslational modifications (e.g., p120 phosphorylation). It is possible that the functional disruption of the cadherincatenin complex, which is often the result of Ras mutations or constitutive receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, promotes a more invasive phenotype by reducing the affinity of p120 for E-cadherin. As invasiveness was tested here using cell culture models, future studies are needed to show whether these results reflect invasive behavior in vivo. In any case, our data indicate that endogenous p120 acts as a rheostat, promoting a sessile cellular phenotype when associated with E-cadherin or a motile phenotype when associated with mesenchymal cadherins.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunofluorescence
Immunofluorescence localization procedures have been described in detail (Thoreson et al., 2000). The following primary antibodies were used: 0.5 µg/ml F1
SH p120 polyclonal antibody (Wu et al., 1998) and 1 µg/ml HECD-1 (Zymed Laboratories). The secondary antibodies used were goat anti-mouse Alexa 488 (Invitrogen) and goat anti-rabbit Alexa 596 at 1:600. Cells were visualized under a fluorescent microscope (DM5000B; Leica) using a 63x/1.4 HCX planApo oil objective (Leica). Photos were acquired with the FX4000 program (Leica) using a charge-coupled device camera (DFC350FX; Leica) and compiled in Photoshop (Adobe) and PowerPoint (Microsoft).
Constructs
LZRS-mp120 isoform 1A-neo, LZRS-mp120 A1-neo, LZRS-wt-E-cadherin-neo, and LZRS-764-AAA-neo were described previously (Ireton et al., 2002). The pRS vector was a gift from R. Agami (The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands). pRS human p120 shRNA was also described previously (Davis et al., 2003). LZRS-MS-zeocin was provided by A. Reynolds (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN) and encodes for zeocin instead of neomycin resistance. Initially, LZRS-
CB-GFP was generated by subcloning an EcoRI fragment of pCAN-
CB (Anastasiadis et al., 2000) into the EcoRI site of LZRS-MS-GFP (LZRS-
CB-GFP). LZRS-
CB-zeocin was generated by subcloning a SgfISfiI fragment of LZRS-
CB-GFP (containing
CB) into the respective sites of the LZRS-MS-zeocin vector. The RhoA-V14-myc (CA-RhoA), Rac1-V12-myc (CA-Rac1), and Rac1-N17-myc (DN-Rac1) pcDNA3 constructs were all described previously (Anastasiadis et al., 2000). Murine N-cadherin-YFP and N-cadherin-AAA-YFP were provided by K.J. Green (Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Chen et al., 2003). All constructs were verified by sequencing. Smartpool siRNAs against human cadherin 11 and N-cadherin were obtained from Dharmacon. Silencing specificity was confirmed using ON-Targetplus nontargeting siRNAs (Dharmacon).
Western blotting
Western blotting procedures were conducted as described previously (Ireton et al., 2002). Primary antibodies were used as follows: 0.25 µg/ml anti-p120 mAbs pp120 and 1 µg/ml 8D11 (does not recognize human p120), antiE-cadherin mAbs (1/2,500; C-20820; BD Biosciences) and 1 µg/ml HECD-1 (Zymed Laboratories), 1 µg/ml antic-Met (C-28; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), antiß-catenin polyclonal antibody (1/1000; C2206; Sigma-Aldrich), 5 µg/ml anti-Flag tag mAb (M2; Sigma-Aldrich), 1 µg/ml anti-myc tag (9E10; Sigma-Aldrich), anticadherin 11 antibodies (WTID1 [polyclonal antibody] and 5B2H5 [mAb]; Zymed Laboratories), and 0.6 µg/ml anti-actin goat polyclonal antibody (I-19; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). Secondary antibodies were peroxidase-conjugated donkey antimouse IgG and mouse antirabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) and donkey anti-goat IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) used at 1:10,000.
Invasion assay
Cell invasion was measured in vitro using BioCoat Matrigel-coated invasion chambers (8 µm pore size; Becton Dickinson). Culture medium was changed to Dulbecco's minimal essential medium supplemented with 250 µg/ml BSA, and cells were incubated overnight at 37°C. Cells were then harvested using Cell Stripper (Mediatech, Inc.), to prevent the proteolytic degradation of cadherins, and resuspended in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium/BSA at a density of 5 x 105 cells/ml. 100 µl (5 x 104 cells) of cell suspension was added to the top chamber, whereas Dulbecco's minimal essential medium/BSA containing either 20 ng/ml HGF (Reprotech, Inc.) or 5% FBS was added to the lower chamber as a chemoattractant. Cells were allowed to invade the Matrigel and migrate to the underside of the invasion chamber for 20 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cells on the top surface of the chamber were removed by gentle scrubbing with a cotton swab, and cells on the underside were stained with crystal violet and counted. Control experiments established that no growth differences existed between all cell lines tested under the conditions of this assay. Data from several experiments were expressed as percentage of control and represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent determinations performed in duplicate. One, two, and three asterisks represent P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively (t test, or one way ANOVA followed by post-hoc comparisons using the Newman-Keuls test). The H-1152 Rho kinase inhibitor (Calbiochem) was used in some experiments at 1.6 nM, which is the reported Ki for this compound.
Scratch-wound assay
Cells were harvested using Cell Stripper, washed twice in PBS, and resuspended at 1 x 106 cells/ml in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium. 3 x 105 cells in 300 µl of media were then cultured in 4-well chamber slides (Nunc). 24 h later, cells were washed again with PBS and supplemented with serum-free media for 12 h. Confluent cell monolayers were scratched using a 200-µl Finnpipette tip, and serum-free medium containing 20 ng/ml HGF was added to the cells. Migration of cells into the wound was monitored in multiple wells using a live cell imaging workstation (AS-MDW; Leica) with a 20x/04 N Plan objective. Images were captured every 60 min, and images shown represent 0 and 12 h after HGF addition.
Aggregation assay
Cells were tested for their ability to aggregate in hanging drop suspension cultures, as previously described (Thoreson et al., 2000). In brief, cells were suspended using Cell Stripper, washed in PBS, and resuspended in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium. 1.5 x 105 cells in 30 µl of media were suspended as hanging drops from the lid of a 24-well culture dish and allowed to aggregate overnight in a humid 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. Aggregation was assessed 18 h after plating. To assay for tightness of cellcell adhesion, cells were subjected to shear force by passing them 10 times through a standard 200-µl Finnpipette tip. Cells were photographed within 10 min through the AS-MDW live cell imaging workstation using a 10x phase-contrast objective.
Rho/Rac activity assays
MDA-231 cells were plated in 100-mm dishes. 18 h later, the cells were washed and incubated for an additional 12 h in serum-free media, and RhoA or Rac1 activities were determined as described previously (Anastasiadis et al., 2000). In some cases, serum-deprived cells were treated with 20 ng/ml HGF for the indicated times before cell lysis. Cells were lysed for 5 min at 0°C in 500 µl of lysis buffer (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 0.5% NP-40, 100 mM NaCl, 0.2% deoxycholic acid, 10% glycerol, and 10 mM MgCl2) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Lysates were clarified with a 5-min microcentrifugation, and supernatants were transferred to new tubes containing 30 µg of either Rhotekin RBD or PAK-1 PBD (Upstate Biotechnology) bound to glutathione beads. A 20-µl aliquot of supernatant was also saved for the determination of total RhoA/Rac1 and p120 levels in each sample. After a 45-min incubation at 4°C, beads were washed in wash buffer (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 0.5% NP-40, 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 10 mM MgCl2), and bound RhoA- or Rac1-GTP, as well as total RhoA/Rac1, were visualized after SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using either a RhoA-specific mAb (26C4; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) or a Rac-1specific mAb (BD Biosciences). GTP
S- or GDP-labeled cell lysates were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01 CA100467 (to P. Anastasiadis) and by Team Science Program grant 05-TSP-01 from the Florida Department of Health.
Submitted: 3 May 2006
Accepted: 18 August 2006
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anastasiadis, P.Z., and A.B. Reynolds. 2001. Regulation of Rho GTPases by p120-catenin. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13:604610.[CrossRef][Medline]
Anastasiadis, P.Z., S.Y. Moon, M.A. Thoreson, D.J. Mariner, H.C. Crawford, Y. Zheng, and A.B. Reynolds. 2000. Inhibition of RhoA by p120 catenin. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:637644.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bellovin, D.I., R.C. Bates, A. Muzikansky, D.L. Rimm, and A.M. Mercurio. 2005. Altered localization of p120 catenin during epithelial to mesenchymal transition of colon carcinoma is prognostic for aggressive disease. Cancer Res. 65:1093810945.
Berx, G., and F. Van Roy. 2001. The E-cadherin/catenin complex: an important gatekeeper in breast cancer tumorigenesis and malignant progression. Breast Cancer Res. 3:289293.[CrossRef][Medline]
Braga, V.M. 2002. Cell-cell adhesion and signalling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:546556.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chen, X., S. Kojima, G.G. Borisy, and K.J. Green. 2003. p120 catenin associates with kinesin and facilitates the transport of cadherin-catenin complexes to intercellular junctions. J. Cell Biol. 163:547557.
Conacci-Sorrell, M., J. Zhurinsky, and A. Ben-Ze'ev. 2002. The cadherin-catenin adhesion system in signaling and cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 109:987991.[CrossRef][Medline]
Davis, M.A., R.C. Ireton, and A.B. Reynolds. 2003. A core function for p120-catenin in cadherin turnover. J. Cell Biol. 163:525534.
Fang, X., H. Ji, S.W. Kim, J.I. Park, T.G. Vaught, P.Z. Anastasiadis, M. Ciesiolka, and P.D. McCrea. 2004. Vertebrate development requires ARVCF and p120 catenins and their interplay with RhoA and Rac. J. Cell Biol. 165:8798.
Feltes, C.M., A. Kudo, O. Blaschuk, and S.W. Byers. 2002. An alternatively spliced cadherin-11 enhances human breast cancer cell invasion. Cancer Res. 62:66886697.
Gavard, J., M. Lambert, I. Grosheva, V. Marthiens, T. Irinopoulou, J.F. Riou, A. Bershadsky, and R.M. Mege. 2004. Lamellipodium extension and cadherin adhesion: two cell responses to cadherin activation relying on distinct signalling pathways. J. Cell Sci. 117:257270.
Goodwin, M., E.M. Kovacs, M.A. Thoreson, A.B. Reynolds, and A.S. Yap. 2003. Minimal mutation of the cytoplasmic tail inhibits the ability of E-cadherin to activate Rac but not phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase: direct evidence of a role for cadherin-activated Rac signaling in adhesion and contact formation. J. Biol. Chem. 278:2053320539.
Grosheva, I., M. Shtutman, M. Elbaum, and A.D. Bershadsky. 2001. p120 catenin affects cell motility via modulation of activity of Rho-family GTPases: a link between cell-cell contact formation and regulation of cell locomotion. J. Cell Sci. 114:695707.[Abstract]
Hazan, R.B., G.R. Phillips, R.F. Qiao, L. Norton, and S.A. Aaronson. 2000. Exogenous expression of N-cadherin in breast cancer cells induces cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. J. Cell Biol. 148:779790.
Ikenoya, M., H. Hidaka, T. Hosoya, M. Suzuki, N. Yamamoto, and Y. Sasaki. 2002. Inhibition of rho-kinase-induced myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) phosphorylation in human neuronal cells by H-1152, a novel and specific Rho-kinase inhibitor. J. Neurochem. 81:916.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ireton, R.C., M.A. Davis, J. van Hengel, D.J. Mariner, K. Barnes, M.A. Thoreson, P.Z. Anastasiadis, L. Matrisian, L.M. Bundy, L. Sealy, et al. 2002. A novel role for p120 catenin in E-cadherin function. J. Cell Biol. 159:465476.
Jiang, W.G., D. Grimshaw, T.A. Martin, G. Davies, C. Parr, G. Watkins, J. Lane, R. Abounader, J. Laterra, and R.E. Mansel. 2003. Reduction of stromal fibroblast-induced mammary tumor growth, by retroviral ribozyme transgenes to hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor and its receptor, c-MET. Clin. Cancer Res. 9:42744281.
Johnson, E., C.S. Theisen, K.R. Johnson, and M.J. Wheelock. 2004. R-cadherin influences cell motility via Rho family GTPases. J. Biol. Chem. 279:3104131049.
Kiener, H.P., C.S. Stipp, P.G. Allen, J.M. Higgins, and M.B. Brenner. 2006. The Cadherin-11 cytoplasmic juxtamembrane domain promotes
-catenin turnover at adherens junctions and intercellular motility. Mol. Biol. Cell. 17:23662376.
Magie, C.R., D. Pinto-Santini, and S.M. Parkhurst. 2002. Rho1 interacts with p120ctn and alpha-catenin, and regulates cadherin-based adherens junction components in Drosophila. Development. 129:37713782.[Medline]
Nieman, M.T., R.S. Prudoff, K.R. Johnson, and M.J. Wheelock. 1999. N-cadherin promotes motility in human breast cancer cells regardless of their E-cadherin expression. J. Cell Biol. 147:631644.
Nobes, C.D., and A. Hall. 1995. Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell. 81:5362.[CrossRef][Medline]
Noren, N.K., B.P. Liu, K. Burridge, and B. Kreft. 2000. p120 catenin regulates the actin cytoskeleton via Rho family GTPases. J. Cell Biol. 150:567580.
Perez-Moreno, M., M.A. Davis, E. Wong, H.A. Pasolli, A.B. Reynolds, and E. Fuchs. 2006. p120-catenin mediates inflammatory responses in the skin. Cell. 124:631644.[CrossRef][Medline]
Perl, A.K., P. Wilgenbus, U. Dahl, H. Semb, and G. Christofori. 1998. A causal role for E-cadherin in the transition from adenoma to carcinoma. Nature. 392:190193.[CrossRef][Medline]
Qian, X., T. Karpova, A.M. Sheppard, J. McNally, and D.R. Lowy. 2004. E-cadherin-mediated adhesion inhibits ligand-dependent activation of diverse receptor tyrosine kinases. EMBO J. 23:17391748.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sander, E.E., S. van Delft, J.P. ten Klooster, T. Reid, R.A. van der Kammen, F. Michiels, and J.G. Collard. 1998. Matrix-dependent Tiam1/Rac signaling in epithelial cells promotes either cell-cell adhesion or cell migration and is regulated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. J. Cell Biol. 143:13851398.
Sarrio, D., B. Perez-Mies, D. Hardisson, G. Moreno-Bueno, A. Suarez, A. Cano, J. Martin-Perez, C. Gamallo, and J. Palacios. 2004. Cytoplasmic localization of p120ctn and E-cadherin loss characterize lobular breast carcinoma from preinvasive to metastatic lesions. Oncogene. 23:32723283.[CrossRef][Medline]
Suyama, K., I. Shapiro, M. Guttman, and R.B. Hazan. 2002. A signaling pathway leading to metastasis is controlled by N-cadherin and the FGF receptor. Cancer Cell. 2:301314.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thiery, J.P. 2002. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2:442454.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thoreson, M.A., P.Z. Anastasiadis, J.M. Daniel, R.C. Ireton, M.J. Wheelock, K.R. Johnson, D.K. Hummingbird, and A.B. Reynolds. 2000. Selective uncoupling of p120(ctn) from E-cadherin disrupts strong adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 148:189202.
Titus, B., M.A. Schwartz, and D. Theodorescu. 2005. Rho proteins in cell migration and metastasis. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 15:103114.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vleminckx, K., L. Vakaet Jr., M. Mareel, W. Fiers, and F. van Roy. 1991. Genetic manipulation of E-cadherin expression by epithelial tumor cells reveals an invasion suppressor role. Cell. 66:107119.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wong, A.S., and B.M. Gumbiner. 2003. Adhesion-independent mechanism for suppression of tumor cell invasion by E-cadherin. J. Cell Biol. 161:11911203.
Wu, J., D.J. Mariner, M.A. Thoreson, and A.B. Reynolds. 1998. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to the catenin p120ctn. Hybridoma. 17:175183.[Medline]
Xiao, K., D.F. Allison, K.M. Buckley, M.D. Kottke, P.A. Vincent, V. Faundez, and A.P. Kowalczyk. 2003. Cellular levels of p120 catenin function as a set point for cadherin expression levels in microvascular endothelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 163:535545.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||