Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article PDF (Full Text) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wells, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wells, W. A. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Starburst amacrine cells overlap to compute the direction that a light is moving. ZHOU/ELSEVIER

Inhibitory signals and overlapping dendrites are enough to allow the sensing of direction, say Seunghoon Lee and Z. Jimmy Zhou (University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR). These signals allow starburst amacrine cells (SACs) to send signals when light is moving in one direction but not when it is moving in another direction.

Direction-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs) have been studied since the 1960s, but the source of their selectivity was only more recently defined as coming from SACs. Now, the Arkansas group has followed the activity of SACs in retinal preparations. Light going out along a SAC dendrite centrifugally (away from the cell body) resulted in SAC activation; the activated SAC then inhibits the downstream DSGC. But light coming in along a SAC dendrite centripetally activated the SAC far less, so there is little or no inhibition of the DSGC.

The centripetal inhibition of a SAC started when light was up to 2 dendritic radii away. This evidence, plus the transmitters involved and the presence of reciprocal inhibition, suggest that the source must be the neighboring, overlapping SACs. The group suggest that, as light moves toward a given SAC (SAC0), it first encounters the neighboring SAC (SAC1). SAC1 sends an inhibitory signal to SAC0, so by the time the light reaches SAC0 it is inhibited and barely reacts to the excitatory light signal. Consistent with this, the group saw inhibition of SACs by centripetal light before they saw (lowered) excitation. By contrast, light moving centrifugally first excites SAC0, and by the time it reaches neighboring SAC2 the game is over; any inhibition from SAC2 to SAC0 is irrelevant (because it is late) and reduced (because SAC0 has already inhibited SAC2).

SAC dendrites radiate in all directions, but each dendrite is essentially an independent unit for computing directionality. Thus, a single cell can contribute to detection of light coming from all possible directions. DSGCs, pointed along SAC dendrites in one direction, are turned on only when the SACs are not sending them inhibitory signals, which is when light is moving centripetally along the SAC dendrite. The next question is how this precise architecture is established in the first place.

Reference:

Lee, S., and Z.J. Zhou. 2006. Neuron. 51:787–799.[CrossRef][Medline]

William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This Article PDF (Full Text) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wells, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wells, W. A. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?