JCB logo
Keystone Symposia
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 30 October 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1753rr3
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 175, Number 3, 366-366
This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Cosmc converter


Figure 1
Tumor-derived OTS8 is not mutated but is a lower molecular weight due to aberrant glycosylation.

SCHREIBER/AAAS

Cancer biologists are constantly hunting for tumor-specific antigens that can be targeted for monoclonal antibody therapy. Work by Andrea Schietinger, Mary Philip, Hans Schreiber, and colleagues (University of Chicago, IL) reveals that you don't need a mutation in the antigen itself to make it tumor specific. Incorrect posttranslational modification will do.

The group identified a mutation-free antigen in a spontaneous murine fibrosarcoma, called Ag104A. Mice with this tumor produce a high-affinity, highly specific antibody against what the group now identifies as a transmembrane protein called OTS8. Although OTS8 is widely expressed, the antibody was only reactive to OTS8 from the Ag104A tumor.

Tumor-derived OTS8 was a different molecular weight than its nonantigenic counterpart yet, to the group's surprise, was not mutated. The different molecular weight was instead due to altered glycosylation. Whereas normal OTS8 contained large sugar moieties, tumor-derived OTS8 predominantly contained a smaller monosaccharide called Tn. This novel combination of Tn and OTS8 created the tumor-specific antigen. The defective glycosylation was due to a mutation in a chaperone protein called Cosmc, which controls the activity of a galactosyltransferase enzyme.

A single mutation that leads to defective glycosylation provides the potential for multiple possible antigens, and, encouragingly, Cosmc mutations do not appear to be limited to just one type of tumor. In addition to previously identified Cosmc mutations in a human colon cancer and a T cell leukemia cell line, the team discovered that Cosmc was also mutated in a murine neuroblastoma that also overexpressed Tn.

Certain human cancers are known to overexpress Tn. If patients with these cancers have Cosmc mutations, it would strongly suggest that the tumor cells express many incorrectly glycosylated proteins that are potential tumor-specific targets for therapy. Formula

Reference:

Schietinger, A., et al. 2006. Science. 314:304–308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Ruth Williams

ruth.williams{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents