JCB logo
MBoC5 from Garland Science
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online October 22, 2007
doi:10.1083/jcb.1792iti1
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 179, No. 2, 171-
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $30.00
© 2007 Leslie
This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

In This Issue

RNA polymerase on the clock


Figure 1
A glow marking an HIV transcription site allows RNA polymerase's speed to be determined.

Is RNA polymerase II slacking off while it's supposed to be on the job? Probably not. But as Boireau et al. report, the first measurements of RNA kinetics in individual cells show an unaccounted for two and a half minutes in the protein's schedule.

Using groups of cells, researchers have previously determined averages for how many nucleotides RNA polymerase II can add in a minute (900–1,800), its initiation rate, and other variables. To refine these figures, Boireau et al. gauged how fast single cells transcribe a segment of the HIV genome. The researchers altered the segment to contain multiple binding sites for the protein MS2. By adding GFP-labeled MS2, which binds to the transcript, the researchers could track the growth of the new RNA strand. Mathematical models then allowed the team to calculate the timing of different steps.

RNA polymerase II added more than 1,800 bases/min—above the average gleaned from in vitro studies, suggesting that an HIV protein might boost its speed. The polymerase spent just over five and a half minutes at the transcription site. Of this time, making the RNA strand took 114 seconds, and processing the 3' end and other housekeeping tasks required another 63 seconds. That left 156 seconds unexplained.

What the protein does during this gap is unclear. The extra time might indicate that the protein pauses on the promoter before it starts transcribing or that it performs some other undiscovered function. The next step, the researchers say, is making the same measurements for cellular genes. Formula

Reference:

Boireau, S., et al. 2007. J. Cell Biol. 179:291–304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Mitch Leslie

mitchleslie{at}comcast.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents