|
||
Report |
Correspondence to Mitsuo Ikebe: Mitsuo.Ikebe{at}umassmed.edu
Filopodia are actin-rich fingerlike protrusions found at the leading edge of migrating cells and are believed to play a role in directional sensing. Previous studies have shown that myosin-X (myoX) promotes filopodia formation and that this is mediated through its ability to deliver specific cargoes to the cell periphery (Tokuo, H., and M. Ikebe. 2004. Biochem Biophys. Commun. 319:214–220; Zhang, H., J.S. Berg, Z. Li, Y. Wang, P. Lang, A.D. Sousa, A. Bhaskar, R.E. Cheney, and S. Stromblad. 2004. Nat. Cell Biol. 6:523–531; Bohil, A.B., B.W. Robertson, and R.E. Cheney. 2006. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:12411–12416; Zhu, X.J., C.Z. Wang, P.G. Dai, Y. Xie, N.N. Song, Y. Liu, Q.S. Du, L. Mei, Y.Q. Ding, and W.C. Xiong. 2007. Nat. Cell Biol. 9:184–192). In this study, we show that the motor function of myoX and not the cargo function is critical for initiating filopodia formation. Using a dimer-inducing technique, we find that myoX lacking its cargo-binding tail moves laterally at the leading edge of lamellipodia and induces filopodia in living cells. We conclude that the motor function of the two-headed form of myoX is critical for actin reorganization at the leading edge, leading to filopodia formation.
helix; shRNA, small hairpin RNA.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent studies have revealed that myosin-X (myoX) has an important role in the elongation of filopodia (Berg and Cheney, 2002; Tokuo and Ikebe, 2004; Zhang et al., 2004; Sousa and Cheney, 2005; Bohil et al., 2006; Bennett et al., 2007; Zhu et al., 2007). The N-terminal domain of myoX functions as a motor domain, which is followed by a neck region. The predicted coiled-coil segment is present at the C-terminal side of the neck region (Berg et al., 2000). However, a recent study suggested that this domain does not form a stable coiled coil but instead forms a stable
helix (SAH; Knight et al., 2005). The C-terminal end of the molecule is the tail domain that was reported as a binding portion to the specific cargo molecules (Tokuo and Ikebe, 2004; Weber et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2004; Zhu et al., 2007). Because myoX moves toward the tip of filopodia and transports the cargo molecules, the function of myoX was thought to simply be that of a cargo carrier.
In this study, we report that the motor activity of myoX is itself critical for the initiation of filopodia formation. Using the inducible dimer-forming technique, we found that dimer formation of myoX without the cargo-binding domain can trigger the initiation of microspikes/filopodia in lamellipodia in living cells. Furthermore, the elimination of myoX abolished the actin bundles and microspikes in lamellipodia, and the dimerized myoX can move laterally at the leading edge of lamellipodia. These findings suggest that the motor activity of myoX plays a role in the convergence of actin fibers in lamellipodia, thus forming the base for the initiation of filopodia.
| Results and discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Induction of microspikes/filopodia by dimerization of tailless myoX
To further investigate the potential role of the monomer to dimer transition of myoX in filopodia initiation, we performed quantification of microspikes/filopodia in COS7 cells (Fig. 1 C). The production of microspikes/filopodia of GFP-M10MoIQ3SAH-M5CC was four- to fivefold greater than that of GFP-M10MoIQ3-M5CC (Fig. 1 C). Furthermore, addition of the dimerizer considerably induced the microspike formation in GFP-M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP–expressed cells, and the number of microspikes was four- to fivefold greater than without dimerizer (Fig. 1 C). These results suggest that the initiation of microspikes/filopodia takes place with the dimer formation of myoX.
Motor function and proper length of the lever arm of myoX
The aforementioned results indicate that three domains (motor, IQ, and SAH) of myoX are essential for the induction of filopodia. It was hypothesized that the motor activity of myoX plays a critical role in the induction of filopodia. To address this idea, we produced the two constructs having motor-dead mutation in switch I (R220A) or switch II (G437A) of GFP-M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP. These two mutations were found to inhibit both the localization of myoX at the tip of filopodia and the induction of filopodia even after the addition of dimerizer (Fig. 2 A).
These results support a critical role for the motor activity of myoX in filopodia formation.
|
It was reported that myosin-VIIa (myoVII) also has a SAH domain in the predicted coiled-coil region (Knight et al., 2005). To investigate whether the function of the SAH domain of myoX (M10SAH) is caused by the specificity of the M10SAH structure, we swapped M10SAH for M7SAH of the original construct (Fig. 2 B, c). The swapped construct induced the microspike/filopodia after the addition of dimerizer, similar to the original construct (Fig. 2 C). It was calculated that the length of the SAH domain used in this study was
5.4 nm, and one IQ domain was 3.5 nm (Knight et al., 2005). Based on this calculation, the lengths of three IQs and a SAH (Fig. 1 A, b), four IQs without the SAH (Fig. 2 B, a), and five IQs without the SAH (Fig. 2 B, b) were 15.9 nm, 14.0 nm, and 17.5 nm, respectively. These results suggest that deletion of the SAH hampered the proper movement of myoX because of the lack of sufficient neck length. The results also indicate that it is important for myoX movement to have the certain minimum neck length. Therefore, it is likely that the SAH domain provides enough span and flexibility for myoX heads to search for the proper binding sites on actin filaments.
Dimerizer-induced formation of the two-headed structure of myoX
To examine whether AP20187 actually induces dimer formation in the cells, we expressed myc-M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP along with GFP-M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP-HA in COS7 cells (Fig. 3 A).
The cells cotransfected with the aforementioned two constructs were incubated with or without AP20187. The myoX construct immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibodies was recognized by both anti-myc and anti-HA antibodies only when the cells were incubated with AP20187 (Fig. 3 B, lane 4). The result indicates that AP20187 induces the dimer formation of M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP in cells. It should be noted that the dimer formation of the same construct was not detected with AP21967 (unpublished data). To directly visualize the structure of the molecules of the myoX constructs, the isolated myoX molecules were subjected to electron microscopic observation. Approximately 70% of the molecules of M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP were two headed in the presence of AP20187, whereas all of the molecules were monomeric in the absence of AP20187 (Fig. 3 C). These results clearly show that AP20187 induces the two-headed structure of M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP.
|
|
It was also discovered that after the addition of AP20187, GFP-M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP moved laterally along the leading edge and fused with another tip of filopodia (Fig. 4 C and Video 3, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200703178/DC1). It should be emphasized that the lateral movement was not observed before addition of the dimerizer. Lateral movement of the full-length myoX has been reported using another cell line (Sousa et al., 2006). The present results suggest that the tail domain is not necessary for the lateral movement of myoX along the leading edge of lamellipodia and that formation of the two-headed structure is critical not only for intrafilopodial movement but also for lateral movement at the leading edge.
Knockdown of the expression of myoX
To further clarify the function of myoX in filopodia formation, experiments were conducted to eliminate the expression of endogenous myoX, and the effect of the deletion of myoX in actin dynamics was examined. The myoX-specific siRNA markedly reduced the expression of myoX as revealed by both Western blotting (Fig. S1 A) and immunocytochemistry (Fig. S1 B, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200703178/DC1). In control double-stranded RNA–treated cells, the endogenous myoX localized at the tips of detectable actin filaments (bundles) that are aligned radially at the leading edge in lamellipodium. The elimination of myoX abolished not only the myoX localization at the tip of lamellipodia but also the radial arrangement of actin bundles at the cell periphery (Fig. S1 B). We also used pSIREN-DNR-DsRed plasmid that coexpresses small hairpin RNA (shRNA) and DsRed simultaneously to monitor the transfected cells. Two target sequences were used as a control: mouse specific (siM10m) and human specific (siM10h; Fig. S1 C). 3 d after the transfection, immunostaining showed that the expression of siM10m but not siM10h shRNAs markedly decreased levels of myoX in mouse NIH3T3 cells (Fig. S1 D). It should be noted that siM10m showed an effect on the actin structure similar to myoX-specific siRNA (Fig. 5 A).
|
Based on these results, we propose the following model (Fig. 5 C). (1) MyoX is present as a dimer and monomer in the cells. The monomeric (single headed) myoX does not localize at the edge of lamellipodia. (2) Once the dimer is produced, myoX moves to the tip of the actin filaments, presumably as a result of its ability to walk on the actin filaments toward the barbed end. (3) The tips move laterally along the leading edge with actin filaments, and the mechanical activity of myoX plays a role in this process. (4) The lateral movement of myoX convergences on the barbed end of the actin filaments, thus producing the base of filopodia where the actin polymerization system might gather to induce parallel actin bundles.
According to the convergent elongation model of filopodia formation, the initiation step of filopodia consists of actin filament convergence and the barbed-end interaction in lamellipodia (Svitkina et al., 2003). We think that the lateral movement of dimerized myoX powers these movements and the structural changes of actin cytoskeleton in the lamellipodia. The function of the SAH domain can be related to the step size of myoX or the flexibility of the neck domain to search for an appropriate binding site on an actin protofilament. It has been reported that the shortening of the neck length of myoV markedly diminishes the run length (Purcell et al., 2002). Because the neck length (the number of IQ motifs) of myoX is one half of myoV, it is thought that the SAH domain functions to help myoX to find the proper actin monomer in the filament, thus facilitating the continuous movement.
Although the tailless myoX can initiate filopodia formation, the filopodia produced are short and unstable. These results suggest that the tail portion of myoX is important for the elongation and stabilization of filopodia and that these processes are likely to be controlled by the cargo molecules binding to the tail of myoX. Recently, it was reported that the unconventional myosin myosin-VI is dimerized after binding to Disabled-2 or the lipids phosphatidylinositol 4,5-disphosphate (Spudich et al., 2006). The pleckstrin homology domain of myoX also binds to the lipid phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate in vitro (Tacon et al., 2004). Thus, it is possible that the dimer formation of myoX is induced by lipid binding. The tail domains of myoX have binding partners such as microtubules (Weber et al., 2004), integrins (Zhang et al., 2004), and VASP (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein; Tokuo and Ikebe, 2004). It is plausible that these binding proteins also control the dimer formation of myoX. Understanding the spatio-temporal regulation of the monomer-dimer transition of myoX in cells is a critical problem requiring further study.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Regulated dimerization system
Based on human FKBP and its small molecular ligands (Mallet et al., 2002), an FKBP was fused to the C-terminal end of the SAH domain of myoX (GFP-M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP). The membrane-permeable drug created by chemical cross-linking of the two monomeric ligands with short linker (AP20187) can specifically bind to FKBP. If two FKBPs are present, AP20187 binds to both FKBPs, thus creating a dimer of the targeting molecule. As a control, we used AP21967, a chemically modified derivative of rapamycin that can induce the heterodimerization of FKBP and FRB-containing fusion proteins. To create pEGFP-M10MoIQ3-FKBP and pEGFP-M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP, a fragment encoding FKBP was isolated from pC4-Fv1E (provided by ARIAD Pharmaceuticals) by restriction digestion and subcloned into pEGFP-M10MoIQ3 and pEGFP-M10MoIQ3SAH. pEGFP-M10MoIQ3-M7SAH-FKBP was created by swapping M10SAH for the rat myoVII SAH domain (M7SAH; 869–926 amino acids).
To determine the dimer formation by AP20187, COS7 cells were cotransfected with myc-M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP and GFP-M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP-HA. 16 h after transfection, 100 nM AP20187 was added to the culture medium and incubated for 30 min. The cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-HA antibody. The immunoprecipitated samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting with anti-HA and anti-myc antibodies.
Motor-dead construct
The sequence of the switch I loop (NNNSSRFG; residues 215–220) of myoX with the exception of the second N is conserved in all nearby myosins sequenced so far (Shimada et al., 1997). The R to A mutation in the switch I loop results in loss of the ATP binding ability of skeletal myosin-II (Li et al., 1998) and the actin filament sliding activity of Dictyostelium discoideum myosin-II in the in vitro motility assay (Shimada et al., 1997). The motor domain of myoX also has a conserved sequence of the switch II loop (DIFGFE; residues 434–439) that has a charge interaction with switch I loop. This interaction is critical for ATP hydrolysis by myosin (Li et al., 1998). Although the G to A mutation in switch II does not abolish ATP binding to the active site, it causes the loss of ATP hydrolysis (Kambara et al., 1999) and actin sliding activity (Sasaki et al., 1998). According to the aforementioned results, we made two types of motor-dead constructs having a mutation in switch I (R220A) or in switch II (G437A) by site-directed mutagenesis (Kunkel, 1985, 1987) of pEGFP-M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP (Fig. 2 A).
Cell culture and transfection
African green monkey kidney COS7 cells and NIH3T3 fibroblasts (American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in DME supplemented with 10% FCS. Transient transfections were performed with Fugene-6 (Roche Biochemicals) or LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. At 16 h after transfection, cells were trypsinized and replated on FN for 3 h, fixed, and stained with rhodamine-phalloidin.
Immunofluorescence microscopy
Immunofluorescence microscopy was performed as described previously (Tokuo and Ikebe, 2004). In brief, cells were cultured on 10 µg/ml FN-coated coverslips fixed with 4% formaldehyde, 2 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EGTA in PBS for 10 min at RT, treated with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min, and washed with PBS. Blocking was performed by incubating the fixed cells with 5% BSA in PBS for 60 min at RT. After the antibodies had been diluted with the blocking solution, the cells were incubated at 4°C overnight with the primary antibody and subsequently for 30 min with the secondary antibody. For actin staining, AlexaFluor phalloidin (Invitrogen) was added to the secondary antibody. Specimens were observed at RT using a laser-scanning confocal microscope (DM IRB; Leica) controlled by a confocal microscope system (TCS SP II; Leica) equipped with a Plan-Apochromat 60x 1.40 NA oil immersion objective (Leica) with appropriate binning of pixels and exposure time. The images were processed using Photoshop 7.0 software (Adobe). Immunofluorescence video microscopy was imaged using the same system of immunofluorescence to control illumination shutters and camera exposure (Leica). Time-lapse images were obtained by sequential epifluorescent and phase illumination. The intervals were 10 s, and exposure times were 100–300 ms depending on the time-lapse interval and level of fluorescence. Cells were imaged over periods of 1–30 min at room temperature (25–30°C). Video files were created using QuickTime (Apple).
Quantification of microspikes/filopodia
Spread cells containing prominent lamella with leading edges were chosen from phalloidin-stained samples. The number of actin bundles touching (microspike) or crossing (filopodium) the edge was counted. Only bundles that have fluorescence intensity of at least 1.2 times above the background were considered. Data were analyzed using a t test. 50 cells (Figs. 1 C and 2 C) and 20 cells (Fig. 5 B) were quantified for each sample. For the rescue experiments, analysis of the number of microspikes/filopodia used cells expressing GFP-M10MoIQ3SAH-FKBP.
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting analysis
Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EGTA, 1 mM ATP, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin A, and 1 µg/ml trypsin inhibitor). The samples were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20 min at 4°C, and the supernatants were incubated with antibodies conjugated to Affi-Prep Protein A (Bio-Rad Laboratories) for 2 h at 4°C. The precipitates were washed five times in ice-cold lysis buffer. The precipitates were dissolved in 5% SDS and 0.5 M NaHCO3 buffer. These samples were then subjected to Western blotting as described previously (Tokuo and Ikebe, 2004).
Recombinant protein and electron microscopy
M10-MoIQ3SAH-FKBP-GFP was subcloned into pFastBac-HT baculovirus transfer vector (Invitrogen) containing a hexa-His-tag. The recombinant M10-MoIQ3SAH-FKBP-GFP protein was copurified with calmodulin as reported previously (Homma and Ikebe, 2005) with an additional incubation with or without 100 nM AP20187 (ARIAD Pharmaceuticals) for 30 min at RT before the cell lysis step. Rotary metal-shadowing electron microscopy of M10-MoIQ3SAH-FKBP-GFP was performed as described previously (Li et al., 2006). In brief, myoX proteins diluted to
4 nM were absorbed onto a freshly cleaved mica surface for 30 s. Unbound proteins were rinsed away, and the specimen was stabilized by brief exposure to uranyl acetate as described previously (Mabuchi, 1990). The specimen was visualized by the rotary shadowing technique according to a previously described method (Mabuchi, 1991) with an electron microscope (model 300; Philips) at 60 kV.
siRNA experiments
The mouse myoX Stealth siRNA (target sequence 5'-GGAUGUCGGGCUGAUUGAUUCUGUA-3' corresponding to nt 4,011–4,035 relative to the start codon) was generated by Invitrogen. Control siRNA was purchased from Dharmacon. pSIREN-DNR-DsRed-siM10h and -siM10m were constructed according to the manufacturer's instructions (BD Biosciences). The selected target sequences for siM10h was nt 135–153 of human myoX (GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession no. AF_234532) and for siM10m was nt 135–153 of mouse myoX (GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession no. NM_019472). siM10h and siM10m had three base mismatches; thus, siM10h served as a negative control of siM10m. The rescue construct (GFP-M10MoIQ3-SAH-FKBP) made from bovine myoX had four base mismatches to siM10m and were refractory to siM10m siRNA. The siRNA and plasmid transfection were performed using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were analyzed 3 d after transfection.
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows the depletion of myoX in NIH3T3 cells. Video 1 shows the movement of tailless myoX (GFP-M10-MoIQ3SAH-FKBP) in a spreading COS7 cell. Video 2 shows the movement of tailless myoX in a migrating COS7 cell. Video 3 shows lateral movement of the tailless myoX along the leading edge of a migrating cell upon addition of the dimerizer. Online supplemental material is available at http//www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200703178/DC1.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants AR048526, AR048898, and DC006103.
Submitted: 27 March 2007
Accepted: 22 September 2007
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bohil, A.B., B.W. Robertson, and R.E. Cheney. 2006. Myosin-X is a molecular motor that functions in filopodia formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:12411–12416.
Bennett, R.D., A.S. Mauer, and E.E. Strehler. 2007. Calmodulin-like protein increases filopodia-dependent cell motility via up-regulation of myosin-10. J. Biol. Chem. 282:3205–3212.
Bentley, D., and T.P. O'Connor. 1994. Cytoskeletal events in growth cone steering. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4:43–48.[CrossRef][Medline]
Berg, J.S., and R.E. Cheney. 2002. Myosin-X is an unconventional myosin that undergoes intrafilopodial motility. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:246–250.[CrossRef][Medline]
Berg, J.S., B.H. Derfler, C.M. Pennisi, D.P. Corey, and R.E. Cheney. 2000. Myosin-X, a novel myosin with pleckstrin homology domains, associates with regions of dynamic actin. J. Cell Sci. 113:3439–3451.[Abstract]
Biyasheva, A., T. Svitkina, P. Kunda, B. Baum, and G. Borisy. 2004. Cascade pathway of filopodia formation downstream of SCAR. J. Cell Sci. 117:837–848.
Homma, K., and M. Ikebe. 2005. Myosin X is a high duty ratio motor. J. Biol. Chem. 280:29381–29391.
Kambara, T., T.E. Rhodes, R. Ikebe, M. Yamada, H.D. White, and M. Ikebe. 1999. Functional significance of the conserved residues in the flexible hinge region of the myosin motor domain. J. Biol. Chem. 274:16400–16406.
Knight, P.J., K. Thirumurugan, Y. Xu, F. Wang, A.P. Kalverda, W.F. Stafford III, J.R. Sellers, and M. Peckham. 2005. The predicted coiled-coil domain of myosin 10 forms a novel elongated domain that lengthens the head. J. Biol. Chem. 280:34702–34708.
Kunkel, T.A. 1985. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:488–492.
Kunkel, T.A., J.D. Roberts, and R.A. Zakour. 1987. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 154:367–382.[Medline]
Lebrand, C., E.W. Dent, G.A. Strasser, L.M. Lanier, M. Krause, T.M. Svitkina, G.G. Borisy, and F.B. Gertler. 2004. Critical role of Ena/VASP proteins for filopodia formation in neurons and in function downstream of netrin-1. Neuron. 42:37–49.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lewis, A.K., and P.C. Bridgman. 1992. Nerve growth cone lamellipodia contain two populations of actin filaments that differ in organization and polarity. J. Cell Biol. 119:1219–1243.
Li, X.D., T.E. Rhodes, R. Ikebe, T. Kambara, H.D. White, and M. Ikebe. 1998. Effects of mutations in the gamma-phosphate binding site of myosin on its motor function. J. Biol. Chem. 273:27404–27411.
Li, X.D., H.S. Jung, K. Mabuchi, R. Craig, and M. Ikebe. 2006. The globular tail domain of myosin Va functions as an inhibitor of the myosin Va motor. J. Biol. Chem. 281:21789–21798.
Mabuchi, K. 1990. Melting of myosin and tropomyosin: electron microscopic observations. J. Struct. Biol. 103:249–256.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mabuchi, K. 1991. Heavy-meromyosin-decorated actin filaments: a simple method to preserve actin filaments for rotary shadowing. J. Struct. Biol. 107:22–28.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mallet, V.O., C. Mitchell, J.E. Guidotti, P. Jaffray, M. Fabre, D. Spencer, D. Arnoult, A. Kahn, and H. Gilgenkrantz. 2002. Conditional cell ablation by tight control of caspase-3 dimerization in transgenic mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:1234–1239.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nakagawa, H., H. Miki, M. Nozumi, T. Takenawa, S. Miyamoto, J. Wehland, and J.V. Small. 2003. IRSp53 is colocalised with WAVE2 at the tips of protruding lamellipodia and filopodia independently of Mena. J. Cell Sci. 116:2577–2583.
Park, H., B. Ramamurthy, M. Travaglia, D. Safer, L.Q. Chen, C. Franzini-Armstrong, P.R. Selvin, and H.L. Sweeney. 2006. Full-length myosin VI dimerizes and moves processively along actin filaments upon monomer clustering. Mol. Cell. 21:331–336.[CrossRef][Medline]
Purcell, T.J., C. Morris, J.A. Spudich, and H.L. Sweeney. 2002. Role of the lever arm in the processive stepping of myosin V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:14159–14164.
Ridley, A.J., M.A. Schwartz, K. Burridge, R.A. Firtel, M.H. Ginsberg, G. Borisy, J.T. Parsons, and A.R. Horwitz. 2003. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science. 302:1704–1709.
Sasaki, N., T. Shimada, and K. Sutoh. 1998. Mutational analysis of the switch II loop of Dictyostelium myosin II. J. Biol. Chem. 273:20334–20340.
Shimada, T., N. Sasaki, R. Ohkura, and K. Sutoh. 1997. Alanine scanning mutagenesis of the switch I region in the ATPase site of Dictyostelium discoideum myosin II. Biochemistry. 36:14037–14043.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sousa, A.D., and R.E. Cheney. 2005. Myosin-X: a molecular motor at the cell's fingertips. Trends Cell Biol. 15:533–539.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sousa, A.D., J.S. Berg, B.W. Robertson, R.B. Meeker, and R.E. Cheney. 2006. Myo10 in brain: developmental regulation, identification of a headless isoform and dynamics in neurons. J. Cell Sci. 119:184–194.
Spudich, G., M.V. Chibalina, J.S. Au, S.D. Arden, F. Buss, and J. Kendrick-Jones. 2006. Myosin VI targeting to clathrin-coated structures and dimerization is mediated by binding to Disabled-2 and PtdIns(4,5)P(2). Nat. Cell Biol. 9:176–183.[CrossRef][Medline]
Svitkina, T.M., E.A. Bulanova, O.Y. Chaga, D.M. Vignjevic, S. Kojima, J.M. Vasiliev, and G.G. Borisy. 2003. Mechanism of filopodia initiation by reorganization of a dendritic network. J. Cell Biol. 160:409–421.
Tacon, D., P.J. Knight, and M. Peckham. 2004. Imaging myosin 10 in cells. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 32:689–693.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tokuo, H., and M. Ikebe. 2004. Myosin X transports Mena/VASP to the tip of filopodia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 319:214–220.[CrossRef][Medline]
Veigel, C., F. Wang, M.L. Bartoo, J.R. Sellers, and J.E. Molloy. 2002. The gated gait of the processive molecular motor, myosin V. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:59–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
Weber, K.L., A.M. Sokac, J.S. Berg, R.E. Cheney, and W.M. Bement. 2004. A microtubule-binding myosin required for nuclear anchoring and spindle assembly. Nature. 431:325–329.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wicki, A., F. Lehembre, N. Wick, B. Hantusch, D. Kerjaschki, and G. Christofori. 2006. Tumor invasion in the absence of epithelial-mesenchymal transition: podoplanin-mediated remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton. Cancer Cell. 9:261–272.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yildiz, A., J.N. Forkey, S.A. McKinney, T. Ha, Y.E. Goldman, and P.R. Selvin. 2003. Myosin V walks hand-over-hand: single fluorophore imaging with 1.5-nm localization. Science. 300:2061–2065.
Zhang, H., J.S. Berg, Z. Li, Y. Wang, P. Lang, A.D. Sousa, A. Bhaskar, R.E. Cheney, and S. Stromblad. 2004. Myosin-X provides a motor-based link between integrins and the cytoskeleton. Nat. Cell Biol. 6:523–531.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhu, X.J., C.Z. Wang, P.G. Dai, Y. Xie, N.N. Song, Y. Liu, Q.S. Du, L. Mei, Y.Q. Ding, and W.C. Xiong. 2007. Myosin X regulates netrin receptors and functions in axonal path-finding. Nat. Cell Biol. 9:184–192.[CrossRef][Medline]
Related In this Issue article
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|