JCB logo
Celprogen stem cell research & therapeutics
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online January 14, 2008
doi:10.1083/jcb.1802rr1
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 180, No. 2, 251-
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $30.00
© 2008 Robinson
This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Learn more when your neighbors do


Figure 1
LTP induction in response to strong stimuli at one synapse (left, arrows) permits weak stimuli (middle, arrow) to build up nearby synapses.

HARVEY/MACMILLAN

Synaptic neighbors help each other learn, according to Christopher Harvey and Karel Svoboda (HHMI, Chevy Chase, MD).

Learning and memory, which require a strengthening of synaptic connections known as long-term potentiation (LTP), have traditionally been thought to be synapse specific, with one synapse unable to influence LTP induction in even its closest neighbors. But computational modeling has suggested that this kind of influence could allow individual neurons to store more information.

To test whether brains exploit this theoretical advantage, the authors stimulated individual dendritic spines with the neurotransmitter glutamate. Next, a weaker stimulus was applied to nearby spines. This weak stimulus is too low to trigger LTP on its own, but it caused robust potentiation when following the stronger stimulus.

"It made it easier for [synapses] to learn in the future if their neighbors had learned something in the past," Harvey says. But too far in the past, or too distant a neighbor, didn't help: the subthreshold stimulus had to occur within 10 min and 10 µm of the first. The two synapses also had to be on the same branch, suggesting that the bolstering signal probably travels intracellularly from spine to spine. So far, the group has no leads on this roaming internal signal.

The authors suggest that such "clustered plasticity" may link memories that are laid down in close succession on the same dendritic branch. Whether this neighbor effect increases storage capacity remains to be seen. Formula

Reference:

Harvey, C., and K. Svoboda. 2007. Nature. 450:1195–1202.[CrossRef][Medline]



Richard Robinson

rrobinson{at}nasw.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents