JCB logo
BioLegend: Antibody Reagents
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 12 September 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1706fta2
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 170, Number 6, 865-865
This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

From the Archive

The isolation of the nuclear lamina

The number of monikers early cell biologists attached to the nuclear lamina reflected their uncertainty about its function and architecture, and whether it was widespread or confined to a few specialized cells. Electron micrographs often disclosed a layer of varying thickness nestled against the backside of the nuclear membrane, which various researchers dubbed the "dense lamella," "fibrous lamina," "zona nucleum limitans," or just plain "lamina." Günter Blobel (Rockefeller University, New York, NY) had his mind on the signal hypothesis, for which he won the Nobel Prize in 1999 (see "Lost in translation: the signal hypothesis" JCB 170:338), but he decided to take a crack at deciphering the lamina.

Aaronson and Blobel (1974) used detergent to peel away the membranes from isolated nuclei. The husks that remained held their shape. This sturdy layer, they proposed, was the lamina, and the results suggested two of its functions—bracing the nucleus and cradling the nuclear pores. Two follow-up studies (Aaronson and Blobel, 1975; Dwyer and Blobel, 1976) provided more evidence that the layer they had identified enclosed the nucleus and wasn't just part of the membrane.

Then Larry Gerace (Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA), Blobel's first Ph.D. student, picked up the analysis. He wanted to definitively describe the lamina in part because of what he viewed as the erroneous conclusions of Berezney and Coffey (1977). They had proposed that proteins not only formed the lamina but also a "nuclear matrix" that extended throughout the nucleus and intermingled with the DNA. "Our localization was a riposte to their conclusions," Gerace says. He characterized three lamina proteins and created antibodies against them. Immunoperoxidase staining showed that the antibodies strongly labeled the rim of the nucleus; they didn't recognize anything in the interior (Gerace et al., 1978). Rather than a mesh that permeated the nucleus, the lamina was a protein polymer that hugged the nuclear membrane, the researchers concluded—and subsequent work has backed them up.


An immunoperoxidase stain that tags one lamina protein doesn't penetrate the nucleus ("La" indicates the lamina; arrows mark nuclear pores).

BLOBEL

The proteins Gerace identified turned out to be lamins A, B1, and C, three of the four major components that interweave to form the lamina. "We felt we had made a conclusive argument that lamins are primarily at the nuclear envelope, and the data have held up," says Gerace. Blobel describes this series of studies as one of the first examples of molecular cell biology. Instead of being content to identify new cellular structures, researchers were now breaking down these discoveries into their molecular components to elucidate their workings. ML

Aaronson, R.P., and G. Blobel. 1974. J. Cell Biol. 62:746–754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Aaronson, R.P., and G. Blobel. 1975. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 72:1007–1011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Berezney, R., and D.S. Coffey. 1977. J. Cell Biol. 73:616–637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dwyer, N., and G. Blobel. 1976. J. Cell Biol. 70:581–591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gerace, L., et al. 1978. J. Cell Biol. 79:546–566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Mitch Leslie

mitchleslie{at}comcast.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents